"Actually I thought humans are insensitive to phase relations, modulo inter-aural timing at low frequencies for spatial location. Perhaps that is what you meant? But spatial location isn't the same as the frequency-fetishing audiophiles go for."
Au contrare...frequency accuracy vs spatial resolution is the classic Uncertainty principal in high end.
A real high-end system present the ear with a truly 3-D soundscape...some instruments are clearly in the foreground, some are clearly in the background, and some are even higher than others. With a good recording, the hall ambience is also there. Put a great live recording on a great high-end sound system and "you are there".
-TD
From: "Major Variola (ret)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Idea: The ultimate CD/DVD auditing tool Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 10:59:39 -0700
At 07:15 PM 7/8/03 -0700, Mike Rosing wrote: >To produce 65kHz (for cats) my present boss prefers a 1 MHz sample rate.
Do cats buy a lot of audiophile equiptment :8=||
>The human hearing system is capable of noticing phase relations at 100kHz >rates.
Actually I thought humans are insensitive to phase relations, modulo inter-aural timing at low frequencies for spatial location. Perhaps that is what you meant? But spatial location isn't the same as the frequency-fetishing audiophiles go for. To do that well you need casts of the outer ear too.
You doing owl-type studies on auditory localization? Audio-visual mapping and plasticity? Making the cats wear funky glasses?
_________________________________________________________________
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
