(10) See also Harvard biochemist Matthew Meselson, as quoted in Marshall 1990: 372; and Harvey McGeorge: "Toxins or biological agents can be made with little trouble, working literally in a kitchen or garage. Manufacturing a lethal bacterial disease agent requires little more than chicken soup, a flat whiskey bottle and an available source of seed culture" (Roosevelt 1986: 40-41). Griffith appears to agree, asserting that "biological agents can be easily prepared in little more than a well-equipped kitchen....The growth medium for bacteria is not much more difficult to make than is Jello; chicken eggs are usually used for growing viruses." He goes on: "Incubation depends on an appropriate temperature range more than anything else but a homemade storage unit of plywood can be heated with light bulbs and made to serve the purpose. Harvest is probably the most difficult step for the amateur. First, at this stage he may contaminate himself. Secondly, he needs some skill at separating the organism 'crop' from the medium in or on which it has been growing. But a little practice will soon overcome these problems" (1975).[Return]
http://www.us-israel.org/jsource/Terrorism/cbterrornotes.html
anthrax has many characteristics which make it an ideal agent for use as a weapon. Anthrax cultures form spores which remain dormant for years, thus giving ordinance an extraordinary shelf-life. Spores most commonly cause serious skin lesions, but they are nearly 100 per cent fatal when inhaled or swallowed and antibiotics are only effective if administered before onset of symptoms. There is a preventive vaccination, but it is not widely used or readily available. There is no method for decontamination" (1987: 193).[Return]
Earlier in the same article, however, Watkins states flatly that "unlike nuclear weapons, there is no way to restrict the availability of biological agents....wide availability of natural disease agents and the inherent ability of micro-organisms to reproduce make it impossible to regulate possession and production of biological weapons" (1987: 191).[Return]

Reply via email to