On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, James A. Donald wrote: > If the US trys to avoid civilian casualties, this is not out of > fear and weakness. Indeed, when we observe the recent past, it > seems that it is failure to commit sufficient murder that > provokes these attacks. The US does not suffer bad
This is dire lunacy. Currently US is perceived as an agressor by the majority of the world, including the so-called ally U.K. which has lent more than just its name. You will see an unprecedented surge in terrorism in the heart of homeland soon after this campaign is over. These attacks could well be nuclear, or at the very least result in heavy casualities, far eclipsing 9/11. Resulting nuclear strike on a random city somewhere will result in a world wide nuclear arms race. Soon after we're at the threshold of WWIII, a Gdeath event. You probably don't want to go there. > consequences from killing innocents, but from its failure to > kill sufficient innocents.
