Australia under the Howard regime begins to accrue some of the characteristics of a failed state.
The leader of the government routinely uses the tactics of fear mongering and demonisation to discipline a population already worried about world events. The PM muddies issues, blurs the boundaries between one event (the Bali bombing) and another (participating in a war against Iraq).
Virulent verbal attacks on a targeted group (indigenous peoples, asylum seekers) form the basis of the politics of domination. The truth has become a political commodity to be traded for votes and other forms of political acquiescence at critical times (children overboard). Sometimes the truth is simply treated as an obstacle to the fulfilment of personal political desire (the troops have not been committed to any conflict).
The bureaucracy has been politicized and stacked with government loyalists. The ABC's capacity to report without fear or favor has been affected by the imposition of external political controls.
And at the base of these and other insidious developments lies the complete rejection of diversity, the dismantling of liberal tolerance (which in itself is a problematic notion), secretiveness among the dominant group and a political culture that projects profound hostility towards any kind of attempt to tell a different political story.
The government's refusal to heed public opinion which steadfastly opposes the war is in stark contrast to its slavish nurturing of the same public opinion that demanded asylum seekers be harshly dealt with.
Any government unwilling to brook dissent and unable to leave independent institutions (bureaucracy, judiciary) free of political interference invites associations with the notion of a failed state. Under the Howard regime, Australia has taken significant steps in that direction.


Reply via email to