The Revolt of Adam & Eve
A Green Anarcha-Feminist Perspective
by Witch Hazel
As a female anarchist I have for many years thought about and looked around
for any interpretations or writings on "anarcha-feminism." I could find
nothing. Besides a few reprints of writings from the 70s attempting to
define the term, and many writings by anarchist women on various subjects
of particular interest to women (especially women's' health); there just
isn't a whole lot out there. Green Anarchy newspaper (and other GA
endeavors) has recently made an effort to integrate what could be called an
"anarcha-feminist" or anti-patriarchy critique into the overarching
anti-civilization perspective.
This is a good thing -- even giving "lip service" to patriarchy as a pillar
of civilization actually goes a long way to opening up the anti-civ
perspective -- making it feel more inclusive of the experiences and
perceptions of us women living in and resisting the control imposed on us
by a patriarchal world. This "lip service" is an honest attempt to address
what some feminists (anarchist and otherwise) have defined as a "male
dominated" and an "irrelevant to women" green anarchist movement, in a way
that doesn't compromise an anti-civ analysis. But as always, we could still
be going much further. Taken to another level, an anti-patriarchy critique
is as relevant to men as to women (and all those who identify in between,
as many people have throughout pre-history). Anti-patriarchy is not a
female issue. We are not the only ones who suffer under the thumb of
enforced sex roles, division of labor, emasculation of violence, etc. On
the contrary, the devaluation of the feminine archetype could be considered
a parallel to the mind/body split that enabled so much of humanity to take
a drastic turn in evolution toward domestication and civilization. This
"totality" affects men and women in different ways, but they could not be
compared in terms of quantity.
A main reason I feel so uncomfortable with a "feminist" identity is that
most feminist thought denies (or is oblivious to) the inherent feminism in
anarchist ideas not to mention in primitivist anarchy ideas. Liberal
feminism seeks to empower itself at the expense of men. I used to be a
liberal feminist. I studied the theories in college, and I practiced it by
bullying and coercing men to defer to women at all times, as reparations
for thousands of years of patriarchal rule. As I became an anarchist, this
"identity politics" praxis gradually seemed more and more simplistic and
single-issue, and our tactics started to feel authoritarian. I was still
pissed about male behaviors that revealed a lifetime of male privilege (and
I still do get pissed, by the way), but I eventually decided that I would
interact with sexism in an entirely different way. Looking back, I
understand where my rage came from, and why I chose to direct it in the way
I did. I even understand where the rage of some of the radical women in our
movements comes from, and I see it as potentially a step toward truer
liberation for them.
As for the male dominance of the GA "movement", there is undoubtedly a
dominance IN NUMBERS of males over females involved actively as
self-defined green anarchists. This of course does not mean that the ideas
behind a lot of GA activity are not shared by many anarchist/radical women,
in the same way that those ideas are shared by many people outside the
militant anarchist subculture. Just like with issues of biotechnology and
agriculture's threat to food security, when I discuss issues of specific
interest to women, such as the loss of control over our health, childbirth,
sexuality, body image, etc., I do so from an anti-industrial/anti-civ
perspective, and I find that people genuinely agree with that perspective.
I make efforts to publicly identify with green anarchy, so that those
around me - including women -- might consider the relevance of anti-civ
ideas. I want more women to write for GA -- to speak about the "totality"
of civilization with a specifically woman's voice.
Where I first started developing my own brand of "green anarcha-feminism"
(if it has to be labeled) was when I discovered "eco-feminist" ideas. These
ideas most closely resemble the anti-patriarchal, anti-civilization
critique, but much of it is most definitely not compatible with anarchy.
Glorification of Goddess-worshipping cultures as indication that a
matriarchal society is somehow preferable to patriarchy, is a bunch of
crap. This isn't much different from the pro-statist liberal feminist idea
that a woman president would save the world. Some of it is even colonialist
(in its co-optation of indigenous wisdom), or "essentialist" in the way it
defines womens' power in terms of our reproductive capacity. As an
anarchist I felt alienated from much of "ecofeminism," but attracted to
some of it too. Chellis Glendenning put a whole new spin on it for me.
I have never known self-identified GA men who dismiss the institution of
patriarchy as irrelevant to anarchism or primitivism. There has been a LACK
of such analysis, but that's simply not the same thing. The absence of such
analysis has indeed been a product of living in a patriarchal world, as are
many things in all our movements, and I think many GA men have come to
recognize this (all of them I know anyway). This recognition has seemed to
happen partly in response to the insistence of radical women, and while I
despise many of their tactics, I am actually really pleased to see that
those on the receiving end (which is not all men, by the way) have not
turned away from what I consider to be the issue at hand: the lack of an
anti-patriarchy perspective. One of my fears was that the despicable,
authoritarian, manipulative tactics of some women would cause a backlash
against feminist critiques, and obscure the inherent feminism in anarchy. I
used to not care much about the effects of my feminist rage, and when it's
aimed at certain sectors of the population, I still don't. But when it's
aimed at people striving for total liberation, however reactionary they may
seem when confronted on their privilege (aren't most of us?), I am pretty
convinced at this point that if we are serious about what we say we are
trying to break down and recreate, in terms of fighting patriarchy we HAVE
GOT to do it together.
This is not to say that "seperatism" as a method of unlearning patriarchy
cannot be useful for both men and women. I am a firm believer in "men
against sexism" type groups, and "women's safe spaces". I like the idea of
women's' solidarity and "sisterhood" (although I have seen some
power-tripping there), and although the notion of "brotherhood" kind of
scares me, I'm not closed to the potential for liberation there. Also, I'm
not talking here about confronting sexist violence, misogyny, or homophobia
-- those were never issues of contention in terms of having tolerance for
such behaviors. I'm pretty much no-compromise when it comes to that.
As a pillar of civilization, the effects of patriarchy will not be
dismantled or eradicated from our communities anytime soon. As with the
lingering effects of religion, domestication, agriculture, linear time, and
symbolic thought, we are facing a massive challenge in identifying, much
less unlearning, the ways patriarchy has alienated us from nature, each
other, and our own internal wildness. Much has been said and written about
the effects of patriarchal rule on women today, and I hope to see that
discourse continue. But after nearly ten years of feminist consciousness
raising, mostly with other women, I'm ready to hear about it from men and
talk about it with men. It's one thing for men to mention patriarchy in the
list of institutions that comprise civilization. It's another to define
what effects patriarchy has had on the autonomy and social evolution of men
in civilized societies, and to discuss how we can overcome it together,
through our daily interactions, as well as in the ways we fight the state,
support each other when the state fights back, and develop collective
projects that subvert the institutions that control us. Anti-patriarchy is
not an "issue"to take up. It is a consciousness that should underline our
lives as we struggle against the forces of civilization to revive ancient
ways, while realizing an entirely new way of being in a post-domesticated
world.
Link: http://www.greenanarchy.org/zine/GA09/
Comments.(worth a look.)
http://www.infoshop.org/inews/stories.php?story=03/02/14/4801761
