Talk-show host not afraid of anti-war stance


By Kenneth LaFave
The Arizona Republic
Feb. 8, 2003


The USS Roosevelt is on its way to the Persian Gulf, a hundred RAF aircraft are flying in the direction of Iraq, and every conservative talk-show host in America is backing the coming war 100 percent.


Except Charles Goyette.

Actually, there may be some other conservatives on talk radio nationwide who are anti-war, but here in the Valley, Goyette is the only one.

Goyette hosts a show on KFYI-AM (550) from 4 to 7 p.m. weekdays.

"I believe the essence of conservatism lies in doing things that have proven themselves," he says. "We faced a far more formidable foe in the Soviet Union, and we defeated them by containing them."

Goyette thinks containment should again be the policy of choice in dealing with Iraq.

"I want my countrymen to be wise, not foolish, and wisdom requires you to understand the unintended consequences," he says. "One unintended consequence of occupying the Middle East is that it would serve as a recruiting poster for the likes of Osama bin Laden. The fact is, Osama and Saddam (Hussein) are largely products of our previous interference, of us sticking our hands in scorpion pits."

His anti-war stance makes some listeners unhappy.

"I get some flak," he admits. "Some guy called and said that Scott Ritter (the former U.N. weapons inspector who opposes a war with Iraq) was facing child-molestation charges, so therefore I must be a child molester, too.

"Callers like that are self-evidently idiots."

(Ritter was arrested after reportedly contacting an undercover officer posing as a teenage girl over the Internet. His case was settled and remains under court seal.)

The overwhelming support shown for going to war with Iraq by most conservative radio talk-show hosts, along with the level of criticism aimed at Goyette for his opposition, raises the question: Is talk radio sometimes a case of the tail wagging the dog? Do all conservative talk-show hosts really say what they mean, or do some of them say what they think their listeners want to hear?

Goyette declines to comment on that possibility but dances across the intriguing idea of authentically conservative talk radio as essentially radical:

"Conservative talk radio developed in part because it represented people seeking a non-establishment voice, somebody telling them something besides what the media and academicians were telling them.

"Now, to a certain extent, the whole global warfare/welfare stance has become the established point of view. In striking out a position like mine, I am still the anti-establishment. That's a pretty good place to be."

http://www.arizonarepublic.com/smartliving/articles/0208media08.html

Reply via email to