Dogs of War: What's so wrong with being a poodle?
So is Tony Blair a poodle, or a Churchillian bulldog? Neither, according to the pet owners of Britain, who are barking mad about the aspersions being cast on their favourite breeds. Michael McCarthy reports from the front line of a first-class dog fight
13 February 2003
It has provoked strong feelings, the Tony Blair-George Bush relationship. It has led to bitterly opposed positions. It has produced sharp and wounding words. So – amidst all the argument, amidst the increasingly passionate name-calling – how do you react when you hear Mr Blair described as the American President's poodle?

Catherine Lawton-Anderson, for one, bristles with indignation. "I take great exception to that," she says. "They are implying that a poodle is a wimp. It's not a wimp. My God, it's not a wimp. I'll tell you, a poodle will stand its ground. Our Giggsy has taken on a Rottweiler, an akita and a pointer. And she's not aggressive – the other dogs approached her first. People who say Tony Blair is George Bush's poodle are implying that he's George Bush's lapdog. I agree with that, actually – I think Blair's lost the plot – but in no way is a poodle a lapdog. You should never say that."

Mrs Lawton-Anderson's particular angle on the current status of the special relationship comes about because she is a considerable figure in the poodle world. A leading owner and a former poodle-breeder, she is the honorary secretary of the UK Poodle Council. (Aim: "To enable all poodle clubs of England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales to speak with a united voice.") She has two miniature poodles, Giggsy and Sassy, and what she has to say about her favourite breed of dog throws an interesting light on the image Blair's opponents seem to be so fond of.

We might characterise this image as one of fawning submission, of obedience at once deferential and prettified. And it is, Mrs Lawton-Anderson insists, quite false. "When the Consumer Association did a major survey of dogs a few years ago, the Border collie came out tops for intelligence, but the poodle was second," she says. "They are highly intelligent animals. To say that they are fawning with no will of their own – my God, that is just totally wrong."

Many poodle owners agree. Take the art historian and critic Andrew Graham-Dixon, the owner of poodle bitch Biba (so called because "she's black, like that Sixties shop with all those sexy birds with kohl around their eyes"). He says: "They're not fawning. I don't know where that came from. I wish she was fawning and obsequious, that's the problem."

"Poodle" is, he believes, quite inappropriate as an insulting epithet. "I've been thinking. If it's a compliment to Tony Blair, then that's all right. In fact, if I want to compliment my poodle, I may call her Blair. Not that she's capable of the level of cunning and secrecy that he is."

How, then, did the myth of the poodle arise? How has this noble beast become, doubtless to Mr Blair's discomfort, synonymous with subservience? There is certainly nothing in the breed's origin to support its alleged status as a submissive parlour decoration or a piece of leash candy. The dogs were first bred in Germany as hunting dogs, specifically water retrievers designed to swim after shot ducks. (The name in German, Pudel, is thought to derive from the verb pudeln, to paddle. The breed's French name – caniche – has its roots in canard, or duck.)

The breed's most distinctive characteristic – the elaborate clipping of its coat – has an entirely utilitarian origin: it was to enable it to swim better on retrieval missions. The poodle's curly coat is one of the densest of any dog and if allowed to grow it will form heavy, ropelike cords, so the practice began of shaving the dog's body behind the head to ease its passage through the water. This gave it a lion-like appearance, and it is now known as the lion's-mane trim.

But so striking was this look that, for some fanciers, the appearance of the trim rather than the reason for it gradually became the whole point, and it grew more and more fantastic. The Oxford English Dictionary defines "poodle" as a dog "with long curling hair, which is often clipped or shaved in a fantastic manner".

It has to be said that some poodle trims do for dogs what rococo did for church architecture. In the extremities of elaboration they have variegated patterns, and sometimes even the owner's name, cut into the coat. A standard look for dog shows is to have several "poms", or balls of hair, left standing out sharply on shaved limbs, with a final one on the end of the docked tail.

"Yes, it's the haircut that does it," Graham-Dixon says. "It becomes a form of dog topiary, as if it's something people can shape and fashion at will. There's less of it around now – all this being cut into stupid shapes – although breeders still do it. I don't. My poodle looks like a Rasta half the time. The rest she looks like a greyhound."

It probably does not help the poodle's image that the dogs have been bred downwards in size. The standard poodle is about 15 inches high at the shoulder, but then we have the miniature poodle (12 or 13in)‚ and the toy poodle, at 10in or even less.

Combine the small size with the fantastic trim, and we have pretty much lost sight of the hard-working, hunky hunting dog of the German marshes. What we're left with is the quintessence of the artificially dainty, something bobbing along the street, something we see in the mind's eye trotting beside a mink coat and high heels.

"There's something about their image that's a bit 1950s," sighs Sarah Wright, the editor of Your Dog magazine. "And there's no doubt about it; the poodle's heart may be splendid, and its lineage noble, but its prissy image is too strong to shake."

What hope, then, can we offer Mr Blair? Well, he could choose to counter accusations of poodlery by modelling himself on another of man's best friends. And, yes, you've guessed it.

The bulldog!

What could be more appropriate for a would-be war leader than the image of the pugnacious pooch that the world associates with Churchill? Stubborn and stalwart, rugged and robust, unyielding, indomitable, invincible! Bulldog Blair! Sounds a whole lot better than "Bush's poodle", does it not? Never mind changing horses in mid-stream – change dogs! Get on the case, Alastair Campbell!

For the bulldog certainly exhibits all those attributes and lives up to its reputation, says one man who should know – Chris Carberry. Mr Carberry is the secretary of the Bulldog Club (Inc), founded in 1875 and the oldest breed club in the world. "They are indomitable," he says. "If they're ill and you take them to the vet, it's quite difficult to get a diagnosis, as they tend not to show any signs of pain. They do feel pain, but they're quite stoical in that regard."

As their name suggests, bulldogs were bred for the barbaric bull-baiting contests popular for hundreds of years in England until they were outlawed in 1835. The point of the breed's flattened face was to enable them to breathe while their jaws were clamped on the bull's nose. Mr Carberry has a fund of stories of just what bulldogs can get up to when they are upset with each other, but as the owner of six bulldog bitches and a stud dog named RT (or, in full, Merriveen Rough'n'Tough at Berrybrook), he insists that they are not vicious as pets; rather, they have hearts of gold. "They're lovely dogs," he says. "Very gentle."

However, all is not perfect with the bulldog image. There are significant health problems with the breed, says the RSPCA's chief vet, Chris Laurence. "Their noses are so short that they find it very difficult to breathe, and the skin in front of their noses tends to rub on to their eyeballs," he says. "It's like having an eyelash in your eye. They get leg problems – they tend to have malformed elbow joints – and because they have a relatively large head and a relatively small pelvis, they have a lot of trouble producing offspring. A lot of the pups have to be born by Caesarean."

Yet that is not the reason why, ultimately, the bulldog image and Mr Blair may be unable to come together. The reason lies in something ineffable in the character of the man and the character of the dog, according to Mr Carberry.

"Mr Blair," he says, "just isn't a bulldog."

Who is?

More bad news for the beleaguered premier.

"Gordon Brown," the expert pronounces. "He's dour. And tough. And stocky."

Andrew Graham-Dixon, meanwhile, is still thinking about poodles. "My poodle barks at joggers," he says. "I had to have her fitted with one of those collar squirters. It's on remote control and it sends this big cold jet into your neck, whoosh! It's great. She doesn't associate it with me. She thinks it comes from the god of dogs. Anubis. And every time she goes near a jogger now, this bloody thing happens. She goes, 'Whaa-haaay! What did that jogger do to me? He didn't even seem to touch me!'"

Come to think of it, maybe that's it. Maybe President Bush has got Mr Blair fitted with one of these collar squirters. Blair says something independent, and Bush goes, whoosh! And the thing gets Blair in the neck. Maybe that's the real poodle connection?

"I dunno," he says, lost in the enigma of poodle and Prime Minister.

"Do you think that Tony Blair barks at joggers?"

Take our quiz: Are you a poodle or a bulldog?

Your favourite item of clothing is:
a) my rather snazzy plum acrylic zip-fronted fleece top;
b) my sheer black cotton see-through vest;
c) my stone-washed jeans;
d) my braces, if it's any of your business.

If money were no object, you would like to spend the summer:
a) hanging out on a dude ranch in Arizona or something really fun like that;
b) being pampered on a cruise to the Seychelles;
c) hacking through the jungles of Peru in search of the floating brothel of Lake Titicaca;
d) waging war.

It's lunchtime. You're starving. What you really crave is:
a) a chicken sandwich from Pret a Manger with a can of Coke;
b) a bean-sprout-and-cranberry wrap with a bottle of Evian;
c) a cheeseburger with a vanilla milkshake;
d) a 12oz rare steak from Smiths of Smithfield. Hand-cut chips. Chβteau Petrus '82.

You are set upon by muggers in a dark alley. Do you say:
a) "Look, guys, there's no need for this, like, violence, OK? Let's chill, y'know?;
b) "Lay one finger on me and I'll scream the place down";
c) "You should know I'm a fully trained hai kwon dong exponent (brown belt)";
d) "I'll stick that knife where the sun don't shine."

A stranger is walking along the narrow pavement towards you. When he gets right up beside you, what will you do?
a) Give him a frank, appraising look, to establish that you are a decent fellow, a trustworthy ally and a formidable opponent;
b) Dart him a little sideways glance of your own devising. He'll understand;
c) Clench your fists and adopt a defensive posture;
d) Stop dead, so the bastard has to walk round you.


Answers:
Mostly a): You are a poodle of the utmost poodlosity. You are enthusiastic, generous-spirited, you will paddle and splash with the best of them. A born compromiser, you spend your life trying to make everyone your friend.
Mostly b): You are exquisitely trimmed and clipped, but a tad precious and sly – rather more a chihuahua than a poodle, in fact. Though seemingly as cute as a cupcake, you're capable of giving the unwary a nasty nip.
Mostly c): You think you're a bulldog. You'd love to be considered a bulldog – four-square, bloody-minded, tough as nails. Unfortunately you're not a bulldog. Attitude-striking, macho and fake, you are a Yorkshire terrier with delusions of grandeur.
Mostly d): Congratulations. You are a bulldog to the last grunty, squinty, intransigent, obstinate, foolishly courageous inch. You combine the physical beauty of Samuel Johnson with the easy charm of Ann Widdecombe. You take no crap and are always right. But is this a good thing? Even Churchill got sick of being Churchill all the time.
15 February 2003 13:04
Printable Story

http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/story.jsp?story=377798

Reply via email to