Histories of philosophy tend either to be prodigious, learned works, like
F.C. Copleston's A History of Philosophy, or idiosyncratic tracts of
scholarly obfuscation, like Bertrand Russell's A History of Western
Philosophy, and they often present their subject through narrow,
ideological lenses. Gottlieb's elegant survey brings a breath of fresh air.
Executive editor of The Economist, Gottlieb mines primary sources with a
remarkably even hand. He demonstrates that, while cosmological questions
dominated early philosophy, Plato and Aristotle investigated metaphysical,
epistemological and ethical conundrums as well. He shows how the later
Hellenistic schools, like the Epicureans and Stoics; medieval thinkers,
such as Augustine and Aquinas; and Renaissance philosophers, including
Machiavelli and Bacon, built their systems either on Plato or Aristotle.
But Gottlieb's book is not just another plodding survey. His attention to
cultural context provides insight into why various thinkers thought as they
did about certain matters. Plato wrote his Republic, for example, because
he detested the kind of democracy in fashion in Athens, and he wanted to
return to the oligarchy of his childhood. Unfortunately, the book suffers
from a distorted perspective, covering almost 1,000 years of history, from
late antiquity to the Renaissance, in just under 100 pages, while giving
more than that to early Greek philosophy, most of which consists of
fragmentary sources. Thus, Hobbes and Machiavelli, who deserve their own
chapters more than do Democritus or Empedocles, are allotted only a few
brief paragraphs. Gottlieb also engages in some debatable readings: many
find that Kant's theory of self-consciousness, for instance, leads not to
relativism but to absolutism. Nonetheless, this eloquent book offers a
lively chronicle of the evolution of Western philosophy.
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/039332365X/qid=1044017906/sr=2-1/ref=sr_2_1/103-2932406-1249463
