Apart from bugfixes (like a tunable parameter to get rid of UDP buildup in system buffer due to sample rate skew) there has been some intersting discussion on tunnelling through NAT. I just noticed that speak-freely@ doesn't have a web archive. I'll be happy to forward relevant posts to anyone interested (privately, or dump them to cpunx-news to you can read them up from web archives).
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Steve Schear wrote: > I'd love to use SpeakFreely but one of its quirks is that it uses two > different ports to initiate and respond to connections and > communicate. Like many others I uses a firewall appliance. And like many > firewall users we find features lacking for configuring our firewalls so > that incoming traffic on one port can be associated with outgoing traffic > from another. About two years ago I thought a programmer I knew was going > to fix this, but it never happened. Hint: who ever takes up improving > SpeakFreely, please add this to the change list.
