Unfortunately, we incurred our first casualty, one Robert Paulson. Note the willingness of rentacops to use deadly force to stop someone who was finished in the destruction of mere property. This, according to the establishment, was justified as an act of "violence against violence".
As for Starbucks itself, we have no particular qualm.
-Tyler Durden
From: "Jay h" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Small taste of things to come if the war on Iraq happens.
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 07:45:56 -0500
---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: Matthew X <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 20:47:49 +1100
>street, and through the windows of a Starbucks and a Victoria's Secret.
Yes all those evil weapons of mass destruction made by Victoria's Secret... they MUST BE STOPPED!
The obsession with Starbucks really puzzles me. Starbucks is one of the few mass retailers that actually offers medical coverage to even part timers, it allows people to move from place to place and pick up employment at another store, their policies have always been actively supportive of people discriminated against elsewhere such as lesbian and gay, and unlike Walmart, their prices pose no threat to the beloved 'mom and pop' stores in a community. It would seem there are better targets to attack as the evil tools of oppression.
j
________________________________________________________________
Sent via the WebMail system at 1st.net
_________________________________________________________________
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
