On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, James A. Donald wrote:
> On 17 Dec 2002 at 16:43, Steve Schear wrote:
> > [I'm more convinced than ever that nullification figured into the
> > verdict. If so, bravo for the jury. steve]
>
> Both the defense and the prosecution sought to make the facts clear
> and understandable to the jury. So the defense was betting on
> nullification.
Did any of you actually see/read the interviews with the Jury members?
They all thought that they were breaking the law, -but- the judge had
instructed them to only find them guilty if there was intent, which
the jurors said they didn't find. So if there was any jury nullification
you better include the judge as a participant.
They got off because the jury found them -ignorant-.
--
____________________________________________________________________
We are all interested in the future for that is where you and I
are going to spend the rest of our lives.
Criswell, "Plan 9 from Outer Space"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.ssz.com www.open-forge.org
--------------------------------------------------------------------
