On Thu, 30 May 2002, Anonymous wrote: > David Hopwood writes:
Did I miss a separate message in which David Hopwood followed up to my post? Cypherpunks is more reliable for me than it used to be, but it's not always all there. > > math is really advanced and not many implementors or users are likely > to understand it very well. Sure we've got a library but the kind of > people who want forward security would like to understand the principles > a little better. Thanks for the detailed summary! Even if the system may not be ready for prime time, I think it may still be worth looking at it and following future developments. -David
