Disk encryption can always be augmented by physical security, however communication encryption is dependent on available encryption tools and legal rights. If quality tools are not available, then individuals and businesses will not use them. As long as communication encryption is not widespread, crypto rights will be vulnerable to attack as a special interest issue
vs public safety. Of course privacy and other pillars of democracy seem to be special interest issues as well. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > -- > On 21 May 2002 at 15:03, Meyer Wolfsheim wrote: > NAI is now taking steps to remove the remaining copies of > PGP from the Internet, not long after announcing that the > company will not release its fully completed Mac OS X and > Windows XP versions? > > Not a problem -- we have too many communication encryption > programs already. Still a bit weak on disk encryption > programs, and of course, we have no transaction software. > > We may suspect that someone is leaning on the big boys not to > provide encryption to the masses, but if so, it is a bit > late. > > > --digsig > James A. Donald > 6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG > X6j99VDvTvGmFGh1D3CQg9dK9SHeYpD48/ZPZgHz > 4BH3f/B8/u/XrQuUz6UmSd7Vb0Xyl7FKwywwFfFdN ===== End. LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com
