At 01:18 AM 4/1/2002, you wrote:
>Ad hoc wireless is neat, but don't assume you're golden just because you
>own the infrastructure, and there are no wires to trace.

Just emitters in free space.  Even easier to trace than wires.

>What 802.11b,
>currently the only widely deployed technology is effectively 6 MBit
>bandwidth/cell (assuming, no Bluetooth and other nasties are muddying up
>the 2.4 GHz band, including deliberate jamming). Urban networks will be
>typically hundreds to thousands cells across, requiring each cell to spend
>a large fraction of available bandwidth for transit traffic. 802.11a is 54
>MBit/s on paper,

That is the raw signalling rate.  With reasonable overhead expect something 
on the order of 36 Mbps.

>and it might be the last technology deployed if the Man
>will get a clue as to what is going on out there.

If you have the right routing protocol and interference control you can get 
a lot of parallelism and increase the effective bandwidth of the mesh.  See 
http://www.skypilot.com for someone who is doing this.

>Any wireless data products must be approved (see recent ultrawideband
>semidebacle), giving you leverage to block them just as easily as shutting
>down the odd 31337 port at ISPs side. As long as you can't fab your own
>semiconductors on the desktop, you're limited to what is available
>commercially, which is subject to regulations subject to politics subject
>to lobbying.

Yup.  This problem isn't an engineering problem.

> > engineers can do it as well.
>
>Engineers don't think as outlaws usually. The mindset seems to thrive in
>.com, .gov and .mil settings, which typically also make for low-hassle
>high-figure paychecks. The technical issues are simple, but getting people
>hooked using viral applications is nontrivial, especially in the
>worse-is-better context. User base doesn't evaluate architecture and
>scalability long term, they just grab the firstbest technology they can
>get their hands on.
>
>Getting this exactly right requires not only cunning, but also some dumb
>blind luck. Maybe, higher unemployment rate amongs engineers would help.

<sigh> As long as the guys with the money and power want to squash what you 
are doing, you will eventually get squashed.  Being on-the-run doesn't 
appeal to me much.  I would rather find a way to get them to stop (or never 
start) chasing me.


Brian Lloyd
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1.530.676.1113 - voice
+1.360.838.9669 - fax

Reply via email to