"...I am disturbed by the conservative tone of "Bakunin", who seems all 
about, as Bob Black said once, "venerat[ing] their victimized forebears 
with a morbid devotion which occasions suspicion that the anarchists, like 
everybody else, think the only good anarchist is a dead one." NEFAC, as 
well, troubles me in this respect with their near rabid defense of all 
things anarchist and 19th century (except the individualists, of course). 
Well, in case neither they nor "Bakunin" noticed, things are quite 
different now and, well, those revolutions failed. I do not enjoy seeing 
the role of anarchist as conservative played out like this.
Our role, as anarchists, is to carefully examine our history, look at its 
flaws and evaluate it in the context of the current situation. Has strict 
and formalized organization led to social revolution? No. Are these types 
of organizations subject to the same critique of power that political 
parties and states are? Yes. If we want a revolution that has a chance to 
survive, perhaps it's best to look around society and see what kinds of 
informal organization is already there and encourage and support those. Our 
revolution today is not going to look like the Spanish Revolution of '36 
(except, hopefully, in the anti-work character of the working class). Those 
organizations, if they were ever relevant (and history suggests that they 
were not), are dinosaurs now.
Our role is not to force the working class into organizing along the lines 
of some anarchists tired concepts of organization. American workers have 
rejected both revolutionary unionism and its reformist counterpart. Let's 
not herd them back in. The political repression by the CNT on dissenters 
among the rank and file alone ought to caution against that.
As a short aside, I also recommend David F. Noble's "Progress Without 
People: In Defense of Luddism". Despite its name, it is a great history of 
workers autonomous, anti-organizational struggles within unions. This is a 
history we ought to be paying careful attention to because it's still being 
made all around us. It's just a little harder to see for those who rely on 
the Leftist habit of only recognizing revolt when its caged within parties, 
unions or federations.
FROM
http://www.infoshop.org/inews/stories.php?story=02/02/17/2157346

Reply via email to