--
On 20 Jan 2002, at 1:53, Aimee Farr wrote:
> Somebody wrote:
>
> > I, in particular (and many other Cpunk Movement members)
> > do not consider People That Control Armed Men to be "us"
> > and will not identify
> their snitching
> > capabilities with my well-being.
>
> So "Cypherpunks" is a political movement, then? You are
> cohesive, and, as frequently pointed out, have a written
> doctrine. (i.e., "read the archives, twit" seems to echo in
> my mind). You have meatspace meetings, and members which
> identify with you as a "movement."
When the US introduced legislation against the communist
movement, that movement was for the most part centrally
directed from Moscow, and had as its objective the
destruction of the USA and its conquest and occupation by the
Soviet army.
Similar legislation against cypherpunks is unlikely to
appeal to legislators, however much it appeals to you.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
YG8pRN2XWUFtPmOyhOvFuf7mvdGxAJmkDpPm+dTR
45jULQbZKef/x+h89pKChBxm8cz6ZHrC8pjBJsHai
