Last I heard, neither MAE East, nor MAE West were ever dragged into court on co-conspiritor charges just because packets from some German hacker kid hopped through their Cisco's.
----------------------Kaos-Keraunos-Kybernetos--------------------------- + ^ + :Surveillance cameras|Passwords are like underwear. You don't /|\ \|/ :aren't security. A |share them, you don't hang them on your/\|/\ <--*-->:camera won't stop a |monitor, or under your keyboard, you \/|\/ /|\ :masked killer, but |don't email them, or put them on a web \|/ + v + :will violate privacy|site, and you must change them very often. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sunder.net ------------ On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Eugene Leitl wrote: > On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Trei, Peter wrote: > > > If I were a remailer operator, I'm not sure I'd like this. Active > > cooperation with another remaler operator means that if > > he/she/it does something illegal, you could be dragged in > > How is this different from the current situation? Is usage of a specific > mainstream protocol sufficient protection from conspiracy charges? Joe Bob > Postfixuser is hardly a remailer operator. > > > on 'conspiracy' charges, regardless whether you actually > > had any knowledge of the the other operators nefarious > > activities. > > -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a> > ______________________________________________________________ > ICBMTO: N48 04'14.8'' E11 36'41.2'' http://www.leitl.org > 57F9CFD3: ED90 0433 EB74 E4A9 537F CFF5 86E7 629B 57F9 CFD3
