hm yes, you are correct. he wasnt incarcerated. never mind that other part then.
but in all candor, dont ya think that if a guy is there who SHOULDNT be there, he wouldnt be there after a decent timeframe of investigation? notwithstanding other manners of recent injustices of justice, i.e., Mitnick et al, in this day and age, with '1000' under the microscope, doncha think odds are that some of these guys woulda made it out without incident? holy shit what are the chances that the evidence shows they are complicit?! down to the last one of them! if you were in charge of the 1000 would you take the chance at being just another victim? or do you really go so far as to give them the benefit of the doubt FULLY without seeing the information that holds them in such a nice dark place to begin with? i bet if you had the info, you would keep them there too. i bet if the info was incriminating enough, you would look the other way as well when a little manhandling comes into play. i dunno.
