FBI considers torture as suspects stay silent
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/0,,2001350021-2001364909,00.html

AMERICAN investigators are considering resorting to harsher interrogation techniques, 
including torture, after facing a wall of silence from jailed suspected members of 
Osama bin Ladens al-Qaeda network, according to a report yesterday.
More than 150 people who were picked up after September 11 remain in custody, with 
four men the focus of particularly intense scrutiny. But investigators have found the 
usual methods have failed to persuade any of them to talk.
Options being weighed include truth drugs, pressure tactics and extraditing the 
suspects to countries whose security services are more used to employing a 
heavy-handed approach during interrogations.
Were into this thing for 35 days and nobody is talking. Frustration has begun to 
appear, a senior FBI official told The Washington Post.
Under US law, evidence extracted using physical pressure or torture is inadmissible in 
court and interrogators could also face criminal charges for employing such methods. 
However, investigators suggested that the time might soon come when a truth serum, 
such as sodium pentothal, would be deemed an acceptable tool for interrogators.
The public pressure for results in the war on terrorism might also persuade the FBI to 
encourage the countries of suspects to seek their extradition, in the knowledge that 
they could be given a much rougher reception in jails back home.
One of the four key suspects is Zacarias Moussaoui, a French Moroccan, suspected of 
being a twentieth hijacker who failed to make it on board the plane that crashed in 
Pennsylvania. Moussaoui was detained after he acted suspiciously at a Minnesota flying 
school, requesting lessons in how to steer a plane but not how to take off or land. 
Both Morocco and France are regarded as having harsher interrogation methods than the 
United States.
The investigators have been disappointed that the usual incentives to break suspects, 
such as promises of shorter sentences, money, jobs and new lives in the witness 
protection programme, have failed to break the silence.
We are known for humanitarian treatment, so basically we are stuck. Usually there is 
some incentive, some angle to play, what you can do for them. But it could get to that 
spot where we could go to pressure . . . where we dont have a choice, and we are 
probably getting there, an FBI agent involved in the investigation told the paper.
The other key suspects being held in New York are Mohammed Jaweed Azmath and Ayub Ali 
Khan, Indians who were caught the day after the attacks travelling with false 
passports, craft knives such as those used in the hijackings and hair dye. Nabil 
Almarabh, a Boston taxi driver alleged to have links to al-Qaeda, is also being held. 
Some legal experts believe that the US Supreme Court, which has a conservative tilt, 
might be prepared to support curtailing the civil liberties of prisoners in terrorism 
cases.
However, a warning that torture should be avoided came from Robert Blitzer, a former 
head of the FBIs counter-terrorism section. He said that the practice goes against 
every grain in my body. Chances are you are going to get the wrong person and risk 
damage or killing them.
In all, about 800 people have been rounded up since the attacks, most of whom are 
expected to be found to be innocent. Investigators believe there could be hundreds of 
people linked to al-Qaeda living in the US, and the Bush Administration has issued a 
warning that more attacks are probably being planned.
Newsweek magazine reports today that Mohammed Atta, the suspected ringleader who died 
in the first plane to hit the World Trade Centre, had been looking into hitting an 
aircraft carrier. Investigators retracing his movements found that he visited the huge 
US Navy base at Norfolk, Virginia, in February and April this year.

Reply via email to