Jim Choate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's a question of scale, not participants. A nation can engage in > terrorism (eg Syria, Libya). Squirrel definition! Don't you know that squirrels are poor form and generally lead to point reduction? Obviously you were never a debate judge. :-P The relevant definitions here are clearly not those of Webster, but those of the appropriate US laws. By said laws, it is most certainly _not_ a question of scale. Governments can't be terrorists, period. The letter of the law. -- Riad Wahby [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIT VI-2/A 2002
- Re: "Attack on America" - a Personal Response (fw... Riad S. Wahby
- Re: "Attack on America" - a Personal Respons... Riad S. Wahby
- Re: Re: "Attack on America" - a Personal Res... Riad S. Wahby
- Re: "Attack on America" - a Personal Respons... Jim Choate
- Re: "Attack on America" - a Personal Respons... Riad S. Wahby
- Re: "Attack on America" - a Personal Respons... Jim Choate
- Re: "Attack on America" - a Personal Respons... Riad S. Wahby
- RE: "Attack on America" - a Personal Respons... Trei, Peter
- RE: "Attack on America" - a Personal Respons... Trei, Peter
- Re: "Attack on America" - a Personal Respons... jamesd