On Sat, 25 Aug 2001, Sampo Syreeni wrote:
> Agreed. As Tim said, one first needs to show that there is a rights
> violation, and that harm is indeed being done. In fact I'm of the opinion
> that even when that *can* be achieved, it's still not quite ok to regulate
> if the harm is not immediate -- even if violent entertainment does cause
> violence, and people are dying because of it, you need to show that the
> subjects are not left a choice, but are compelled to act violently. Probably
> you'd need to show that they've been forced/tricked into watching the stuff
> in the first place. None of that can be done in the case of "entertainment
> unsuitable for young eyes", of course.
Hume's Fork. You have a logical fault in your thinking.
--
____________________________________________________________________
natsugusa ya...tsuwamonodomo ga...yume no ato
summer grass...those mighty warriors'...dream-tracks
Matsuo Basho
The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate
Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087
-====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'-
--------------------------------------------------------------------
