---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 17:33:10 -0500 (CDT)
From: Jim Choate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Dennis Glatting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Declan McCullagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: If we had key escrow, Scarfo wouldn't be a problem
On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law wrote:
> To be clear, I am *NOT* arguing for key escrow. Just saying that since
> I'm against it, I accept that there may be scope for judicious,
> paper-trail oriented, key logging.
Of course there is, the question is does one use the key logging to get
probable cause; or as the 4th requires probable cause to do the key
logging.
The current trend is to use surveillance technology to obtain 'probable
cause', this is in direct opposition to the letter and intent of the 4th.
Got a warrant, scan, search, collect all you want. Don't have a warrant
then leave people the hell alone.
--
____________________________________________________________________
natsugusa ya...tsuwamonodomo ga...yume no ato
summer grass...those mighty warriors'...dream-tracks
Matsuo Basho
The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate
Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087
-====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'-
--------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
