On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
> Jimbo sniveled:
>
> > The desire to get the 'speech' is what drives
> > the act.
>
> Nonetheless, they are separate and separable. Outlawing the act does not
> require outlawing the speech.
No they are not. You can't make the picture without commiting the act.
If you could, it wouldn't be 'porno', it'd be a fantasy picture or one
taken of consenting adults that would fall fully under 'speech'
protection.
--
____________________________________________________________________
natsugusa ya...tsuwamonodomo ga...yume no ato
summer grass...those mighty warriors'...dream-tracks
Matsuo Basho
The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate
Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087
-====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'-
--------------------------------------------------------------------
