On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 08:59:55AM -0700, Tim May wrote: > So much for the Fourth Amendment, which was designed to protect against > precisely this kind of police and state snooping. When a scrap of paper, > issued in secret, enables the king's men to wander through a house, the > "secure in one's papers and possessions" right has become moot. Yeah. I was in the courtroom in Newark last week for the hearing, and this wasn't a topic at all. The judge didn't care about the secret entry, just wanted to learn more about how the bug worked. -Declan
- Secret Warrants and Black Bag Jobs--Questions Tim May
- Re: Secret Warrants and Black Bag Jobs--Questions Faustine
- Re: Secret Warrants and Black Bag Jobs--Questions Black Unicorn
- RE: Secret Warrants and Black Bag Jobs--Questions Sandy Sandfort
- Re: Secret Warrants and Black Bag Jobs--Questions Black Unicorn
- Re: Secret Warrants and Black Bag Jobs--Questions Dr. Evil
- Re: Secret Warrants and Black Bag Jobs--Questions Greg Broiles
- Re: Secret Warrants and Black Bag Jobs--Questions Tim May
- Re: Secret Warrants and Black Bag Jobs--Questions Declan McCullagh
- Re: Secret Warrants and Black Bag Jobs--Questions gbroiles
- Re: Secret Warrants and Black Bag Jobs--Questions Kerry L. Bonin
- RE: Secret Warrants and Black Bag Jobs--Questions Aimee Farr
- Re: Secret Warrants and Black Bag Jobs--Questions Matthew Gaylor
- Re: Secret Warrants and Black Bag Jobs--Questions Bill Stewart
