At 02:16 PM 7/27/01 -0700, Ray Dillinger wrote: > >You can present your paper at defcon, as long as there's not an >executable. > No executable, but source. Source code is how some people communicate. Building an executable is another (intentional) behavior. Using that executable is another. Using that executable for *unlicensed* copying is a crime. Nothing else is. >You can create an executable, with source code, package it up and >send it to the copyright owner with a note that says "your protection >is broken: here's the proof." How about dropping them a note to send an engineer to DefCon? >You can shout at the top of your lungs that their crypto is broken, >on all kinds of forums. Might be libel if not true.
- Re: Criminalizing crypto criticism + 802.11b access mmotyka
- Re: Criminalizing crypto criticism + 802.11b access Declan McCullagh
- Re: Criminalizing crypto criticism + 802.11b acc... Tim May
- Re: Criminalizing crypto criticism + 802.11b... Declan McCullagh
- Re: Criminalizing crypto criticism + 802... georgemw
- Re: Criminalizing crypto criticism ... Ray Dillinger
- Re: Criminalizing crypto critic... David Honig
- Re: Criminalizing crypto cr... Ray Dillinger
- Re: Criminalizing crypto cr... David Honig
- Re: Criminalizing crypto cr... Ray Dillinger
- Crypto instructions = Bomb-... Tim May
- Re: Crypto instructions = B... Ray Dillinger
- Re: Criminalizing crypto criticism + 802.11b acc... Declan McCullagh
- Re: Criminalizing crypto criticism + 802.11b... mmotyka
- Re: Criminalizing crypto criticism + 802... Declan McCullagh
- Re: Criminalizing crypto criticism + 802.11b access mmotyka