At 12:11 PM 7/21/01 -0400, Declan McCullagh wrote: >The interesting thing in this case is that Dmitry was not arrested for >discussing or revealing information about Adobe's arguably-sucky copy >protection system. If you read the FBI affidavit >(http://cryptome.org/usa-v-sklyarov.htm), you'll note that the FBI >seems only concerned about his commercial activities: And the FBI identifies him as the copyright holder. What would they have done if a group[1] was listed after the (C)? [1] registered corporation, anonymous coders, anonymous registered corporation (?) etc.
- Re: Ashcroft Targets U.S. Cyber... jamesd
- "Engineer for Haloid Corp.... Tim May
- Re: "Engineer for Haloid C... David Honig
- Re: "Engineer for Haloid C... Declan McCullagh
- Re: "Engineer for Haloid C... Tim May
- Re: "Engineer for Haloid C... Jim Choate
- RE: Ashcroft Targets U.S. Cyber... Sandy Sandfort
- Re: Ashcroft Targets U.S. Cyber... Declan McCullagh
- Re: Ashcroft Targets U.S. Cybercrim... Jim Choate
- Re: Ashcroft Targets U.S. Cybercrime Sampo Syreeni
- Re: Rallies on Monday David Honig
- Re: Rallies on Monday Declan McCullagh
- Re: Rallies on Monday John Young
- Re: Rallies on Monday Tim May
- Free speech is for whisperers Tim May
- Re: Rallies on Monday Jim Choate
- Re: Rallies on Monday Petro
- Rallies on Monday Len Sassaman
- Re: Rallies on Monday Black Unicorn
- Re: Rallies on Monday GeEk
- Re: Rallies on Monday Sampo Syreeni