My employer is running a deal right now in which we can wrap our car
in ads in exchange for X shares of stock, strike price current price
of the shares. Even if there's a modest $Y increase in share value,
X*Y will amount to many times the cost of most cars.
So what companies should do is try to get police agencies to seize such
ad-wrapped cars, as long as they can guarantee the vehicles will be driven
and not (gasp) repainted. :)
-Declan
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 03:06:56PM -0400, Alan Olsen wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Oct 19, 2000 - 06:55 AM
> >
> > California Court Declines to Review
> > Vehicle Forfeiture Law
> > The Associated Press
> >
> > SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - The state Supreme Court has
> > declined to review a ruling allowing police to seize vehicles
> > suspected of use in crimes such as drug dealing or soliciting
> > a prostitute.
>
> Portland, Oregon has a similar law. In practice, they take your car only
> as long as it has resale value. (In other words, it is done for revenue
> and not for "punishment".)
>
> Speaking of governmental seizures...
>
> Oregon has a balot initiative to tighten down the seizure laws. They are
> trying to add in that the property can only be seized if the owner is
> convicted of something.
>
> Interesting to see who is lining up against this one.
>
>
> The first few arguments against the initiative are from the animal
> shelters claiming that is will harm animals! The rest are from various
> law enforcement agencies and the like upset because they will have not
> have this hidden source of funding for toys.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Note to AOL users: for a quick shortcut to reply
> Alan Olsen | to my mail, just hit the ctrl, alt and del keys.
> "In the future, everything will have its 15 minutes of blame."
>
>
