At 07:51 PM 9/27/00 -0400, Tim May wrote: >At 7:33 PM -0400 9/27/00, David Honig wrote: >> >> >>It does create a single-point-of-failure if everyone uses the same >>library (or other independent 'module'), but on the other hand, everyone >>rolling their own is likely to introduce more fatal flaws. >> >>Curious what the alternatives are, > >I said nothing about "everyone rolling their own." Yes, that was the most extreme contrast I could think of. A straw man. Obviously bad practice. What kind of modularity (not including linking a source-inspectable library) were you thinking of?
- Re: Lions and Tigers and Backdoors, oh, my... Steve Furlong
- Re: Lions and Tigers and Backdoors, oh, my... Matt Curtin
- Re: Lions and Tigers and Backdoors, oh, my... brflgnk
- Re: Lions and Tigers and Backdoors, oh, my... Tim May
- Re: Lions and Tigers and Backdoors, oh, my... David Honig
- Re: Lions and Tigers and Backdoors, oh, m... Tim May
- Re: Lions and Tigers and Backdoors, ... David Honig
- Re: Lions and Tigers and Backdoors, oh, m... Sampo A Syreeni
- Re: Lions and Tigers and Backdoors, oh, my... brflgnk
- Re: Lions and Tigers and Backdoors, oh, my... Michael Motyka
- RE: Lions and Tigers and Backdoors, oh, my... Trei, Peter