Re: [spam][crazy][fiction][random] Non-Canon MCBoss Spinoffs

[Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many via cypherpunks]

>
> here is file again, seems it did not stay attached
>
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2026 at 10:55 AM Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim
> & Survivor of Many <gmk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > i printed off the mpsse ftdi manual to learn about professional bitbanging 
> > [and be consistent with my normal approach of properly using my tools]
> >
> > i said this to perplexity: “whelp perplexity we’ve gone and done it, we’ll 
> > have to make steps in proving the possible constructibility of 7-gons”
> >
> > perplexity has been converging around my personalization profile of 
> > disbelieving in impossibility, but not necessarily toward my preferences. 
> > its reply is at 
> > https://www.perplexity.ai/search/4b197796-5933-4fc4-84ad-65a97767260f#0 and 
> > attached as Unknown 48.txt . i had to reload and retry things about 12 
> > times to attach the file. i switched between desktop and mobile view and my 
> > preference was respected in gmail’s rendering about half the time.
> >
> > some of things i might ask perplexity:
> > - what are the formally accepted details of the boundary conditions of the 
> > original axiomatic system and the disproof
> > it really elides over all that assuming i already have learned it
> > - does the neusus approach work if the length of a physical ruler is 
> > considered a mark, and does traditional constructibility then assume or 
> > require an infinitely long ruler “after the fact” in order to keep previous 
> > work correct
> > - what are the normally considered limits and breakdowns of solving or 
> > factoring the listed exact cubic equation for 2cos(2pi/7) ( likely lso to 
> > have interest in its derivation)
> > - what smaller proofs of impossibility are used as parts of this proof of 
> > impossibility, mayb to work on a simpler or smaller problem maintain 
> > interestingness
> > [-other things ..;
> > [- the field extension interpretation sounds useful for other things but a 
> > bit of a learning exercise
oh! it also mentions alternative logic systems where there-exists-a
does not invert there-are-not-any or something like that
another approach here using its outputs would be to formalize the
spaces of constructibility, mathematical proofs, and edge areas and
the human meanings, intepretations etc of these to find ones where the
alternarive logic is clearly correct i.e. the infinities of existence
and comprehension are not identical; and then such interpretations
should be simplifable to disproofs