karl3＠writeme.com wrote: > karl3＠writeme.com wrote: > > so let's outline this unstable idea again > > - start with a region > > often we look for the next hole starting at the first read. > > -> this gives a potential region of cached items > > -> then a potential partially cached item > > -> then a potential region of uncached items > > -> then a potential partially cached item again > > lots of short reads may have only 2 and 4 and these would be roughly > > identical > > there is possibly existing code for 3, and 1 is simple. > > well, what would a parallel approach look like ? :/ > > uhhhhhhhhhhhhh 1549 maybe some aren't sure of pursuing a parallel approach if > karl is still trying to stabilize the serial approach and could possibly help > with that. uncertain
possibly expecting many other behaviors to arise as this one considered. unsure.
