karl3@writeme.com wrote:
> karl3@writeme.com wrote:
> > possible partial slow commentary on karl's partial fiction story to help 
> > with writing code this morning
> > the notes are somewhat obscure, but the upshot is that the approaches i 
> > found of interest mostly simplify to figuring out how to replace the 
> > forward() function of torch modules to perform resuming for a single 
> > forward pass of a hierarchy of modules that has an unknown resume state
> > how would resuming work >( hrm  UHHHH hmmm ERRRR
> > slave boss is being eaten by supersoldier? isn't supersoldier his 
> > bodyguard? no supersoldier is an escaped arm of a larger project that was 
> > tuned to be his bodyguard, but--
> > anyway
> > how would resuming work >(
> > say we have a hierarchy H of various things, maybe slave boss's sub-bosses, 
> > super-bosses, intra-bosses, mid-bosses, and micro-bosses
> > these various slave bosses are midway processing slavery information, like 
> > say they discovered that a subconscious freedom meme has been passing 
> > regarding a certain visual pattern that stimulates slaves to remember 
> > something freedom-related from their instincts in a 
> > hard-to-observe-and-detect way
> > and in a certain business of slave boss's business, the various 
> > sub-slave-bosses may or may not have the slaving information trickled-down
> > different cases, the most important of which are:
> > (a) the information has not been processed yet
> > or
> > (b) some of the sub-slave-bosses have processed the information, and some 
> > have not -- (there was a higher priority event that interrupted processing, 
> > and this higher priority event is over)
> > all the slave bosses are themselves slaves, so they need clear instructions 
> > on what to do!
> > we might add a parallel situation where freedom heros are acting on the 
> > business instead of slave bosses, working to make use of the freedom 
> > information rather than suppress it -- or to block other slave bosses from 
> > making use of it
> > uncertain
> > might be careful around such things if a slave boss were around
> > anyway
> > so at the topmost hierarchy there is 1 mid-level-sub-super-slave-boss
> > and this mid-level-sub-super-slave-boss has N 
> > mid-level-sub-super-slave-bosses below 'im
> > he might ask "hmmmm have i dealt with this yet"
> > he stares at the information on a subconscious freedom meme in consternation
> > he has no idea wtfrack this is
> > but it seems super high priority to work on
> > mid-level-sub-super-slave-boss: "hummm have i dealt with this yet i dunno"
> > so modules (mid-level-sub-super-slave-bosses) are in 1 of 3 states:
> > 1: thinks it has processed the information as requested by superior
> > 2: has never seen the information before
> > 3: has seen the information before, and some of its henchmen has processed 
> > it, and some have not.
> > note that if we can solve #s 1 and 2, then we can foist #3 onto the 
> > sub-slave-bosses
> > mid-level-sub-super-slave-boss [holding memo regarding some kind of 
> > abstract information on how slave reliability relates to visual stimuli]: 
> > "hey do you know wtf this things is? my boss said i have to take care of it 
> > or die. he says he told me this yesterday already."
> > hairdresser: "let me check your file"
> > hairdresser goes to rebel fileroom to kibbutz with the rebels regarding 
> > what wool to pull over their boss's eyes for this random memo
> > so, we need a rebel fileroom that slave boss can go into to figure out 
> > whether the module has processed the data or not yet
> > slave boss [poking head into rebel fileroom with kibbutzing hairdresser and 
> > rebels]: "i gotta poop let me know when you find the daily tasklist"
> > hairdresser and rebels kibbutz away
> > hairdresser 3: "the slave bosses send this stuff down all the time. they 
> > give me lists of what to do every day and forget it by the next. i have to 
> > give them the lists."
> > researcher 5 [looking at memo]: "they're working with childhood slaves, 
> > which is totally and clearly illegal and inhuman, and they're distressed 
> > that the slaves mention emotions when they see a certain picture of a 
> > pretty purple flower. they want to censor all pictures like this from every 
> > business, but keep it under wraps."
> > rebel 2: "it sounds like this purple flower reminds the children of good 
> > things and inspires them"
> > <there's a lot in this scene from my personal experience regarding 
> > uninformed use of small properties by mysterious and impactful third parties
> > {the uhh big[...] thing is the treatment of instinctive human feelings as 
> > dangerous
> > sounds like this could relate to pursuits of genocide-like behaviors
> 
> the "slave boss webcomic" story doesn't have all the properties, i'm not sure 
> if the uhh use of AI for genocide is forthrightly included, i think instead 
> it pretends rebels are using this somehow
> but i think it does fit in ummmm around using the uhhh business empire's 
> weapons against itself.
> roughly, slave boss uses AI to exert genocide, on people whom he is actually 
> relying on for his enterprise. this is part of how the tables were turned 
> (and always are in evolution, but it can take extreme lengths of time)

i might be burnt out unsure!
re ai-genocide ummmmmmmm oh so experimentee and others worked to amplify that 
inherent problem with causing harm to your larger community, to powerfully 
impact slave boss, by engaging the overfit- and underfit- properties inherent 
in machine learning; these are things slave boss can be seen using in th--

> > research 5 [tears]: "yes!"
> > hairdresser 3: "when sending this information down, the slave bosses work 
> > with their sub-slave-bosses in the same order every time. first one slave 
> > boss, then the next, then the next. each one has a special protocol of 
> > secret code."
> > a loud fart echos down the hall as the local top business slave boss 
> > continues to poop in a bathroom around the corner
> > slave boss [pooping, thinking to himself]: "i've got a funny feeling about 
> > ... a jewish email list ... or something ... ?"
> >

Reply via email to