> the message shows after the debugging output from creating the answer to the > test. so it's not the null case that is showing the advancing pointers, it's > the next test where one of the docs is empty and the other has a length of 3, > so it's probably totally correct! OOPS!
We want to formally apologize for earlier introducing what appeared like an advanced software engineering that was in fact deceptive due to me interpreting correct output as if it were indicative of a problem, and as if it were indicative of the cause of an unrelated problem. > cpunks: that sounds like a very helpful concept for you to focus on, karl We would also like to formally apologize for controlling expressions that are signed by others than ourselves, as well as for how this can be severely impactful for both those being misrepresented or those receiving the information, to such a degree it can severely harm their connection with their lives, freedom, loved ones, minds, bodies, sanity, pets, civilization ...
