>=2 dropped >> >> (oops, i had to go to court for a ticket, the insurance company wouldn’t >> confirm my insurance and i had to provide alternative proof to the >> prosecutor) >> >> “do you know what traffick boss does to people who oppose him in court?” >> “what does he do?” >> “i don’t know. he probably ignores court and trusts dictatorsoft to >> protect him whatever he does. but he _might_ glare at the opposition as if >> he was torturing and vivisecting them!” >> “oh no!!!!” >> “i know!! i wouldn’t know what to do!!” >> > > so > > the theory behind this one is that the torture and vivisecting is part of > what i know understand— > (—psychological programming/engineering or ritual abuse, and is paired with learned behaviors, for me (although i had something different) it is very quick and surprising, so it is for all the characters too (but it’s interesting in this scene that this is said to be a common scenario)) (so basically it causes a body and belief takeover with the behaviors learned to avoid the severe trauma. this is why it is undue influence to allow a perpetrator to prime his lawyer with things to say to a victim in court, but this isn’t legally recognised yet because everybody is triggered by arguing for it (quick guesses of
> mine after one exposure (here my device powered itself off suddenly and a little was filled in from memory and continued later, some content lost)) (further content dropped
