I just use localmonero to bypass kyc rules. I will. Literally go. Out of. My. Way to not comply
Sent from Proton Mail mobile \-------- Original Message -------- On Nov 11, 2023, 7:23 AM, < [email protected]> wrote: > > Send cypherpunks mailing list submissions to [email protected] To > subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.cpunks.org/mailman/listinfo/cypherpunks or, via email, send a > message with subject or body 'help' to [email protected] > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] When replying, please edit your Subject > line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of cypherpunks digest..." > Today's Topics: 1. \#Alert eIDAS 2.0 (EU wants to force browsers to use > potentially insecure government certificates) ([email protected]) 2. > Anonymity for all - mixmasters for the masses - globalized anarchism now! > (professor rat) 3. Fwd: Mayor Eric Adams NYCCoin Touting (Gunnar Larson) > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Message: 1 Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 23:54:26 +0100 (CET) From: > [email protected] To: Cypherpunks Subject: \#Alert eIDAS 2.0 (EU wants to > force browsers to use potentially insecure government certificates) > Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hello? I hope everyone > is ok.?I think this issue is important so I think all of you should read this > email I wrote.? For years, I have been immersed in the world of cryptography > and have worked as a researcher in the field of digital privacy. Recently, > there have been numerous developments that give cause for concern. As a > digital privacy activist, I am committed to raising awareness about the > critical need for robust privacy protections in today's interconnected world. > The ever-expanding digital landscape necessitates vigilant advocacy to ensure > that individuals rights to privacy are upheld and respected. ?The EU's > planned laws would use emerging technologies to detect new and existing child > sexual abuse material (CSAM) and child grooming activities, and would give > national authorities the power to oblige digital services to scan users? > communications, including encrypted messages.??? > https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2023/10/19/planned-eu-laws-on-child-sexual-abuse-have-sparked-a-bitter-privacy-row-why > The proposed legislation mandates the implementation of a compulsory > scanning protocol for communication service providers, encompassing social > media platforms and instant messaging applications, which facilitate the > exchange of textual, auditory, photographic, and video content inclusive of > all user data. The eIDAS 2.0 proposal, aimed at establishing a secure > framework for trust services within the EU, has raised concerns due to recent > undisclosed alterations made during the legislative process. These changes, > allowing Member States to access encrypted data, raise alarming implications > for mass surveillance. Collaborating with esteemed scientists and NGOs, an > open letter has been crafted to address these critical risks and propose > concrete solutions to ensure enhanced privacy protections in the eIDAS 2.0 > framework. This letter meticulously outlines the substantial risks associated > with the eIDAS 2.0 proposal and offers concrete suggestions for mitigating > these issues. The letter is here: > https://nce.mpi-sp.org/index.php/s/cG88cptFdaDNyRr As an individual deeply > invested in digital? privacy and security, I find myself increasingly > apprehensive about the implications of the eIDAS 2.0 proposal. While the > initial intent was to establish a fortified legal framework for trust > services within the EU, recent undisclosed alterations have raised > significant concerns. One of the most troubling aspects is the provision > granting Member States the authority to insert their keys into browsers, > enabling the interception of encrypted traffic. This opens the door to > potential mass surveillance, infringing upon the fundamental right to > privacy. Additionally, the restrictions on security checks for encryption > keys, limited by ETSI, pose a potential roadblock to the development of > innovative, higher-level protective measures. Furthermore, the proposal's > commendable effort to create a digital wallet for mobile identity is marred > by a critical oversight. Citizens should have the option to employ anonymous > credentials or pseudonyms to shield their online interactions. Unfortunately, > the current draft makes the implementation of unlinkability optional, > potentially subjecting citizens privacy to the discretion of the Member State > with the weakest safeguards. These concerns are not merely speculative, but > rooted in the need to protect individual liberties in an increasingly > interconnected digital landscape. It is imperative that we prioritize privacy > rights and work towards a balanced framework that ensures the security of > trust services without compromising personal freedoms. In addition, most > artificial intelligence systems are inherently flawed, rendering them > susceptible to potential misuse under the law. Governments, under the pretext > of combating child exploitation, can scan the data of a majority of users, > thereby infringing upon fundamental human rights. This grants governments the > power to surveil and exert control over any citizen at their discretion. > Perhaps we can discuss what we might accomplish together. Regards? Zeynep > Aydo?an? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was > scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/html Size: 5321 bytes Desc: not > available URL: \------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Fri, 10 Nov > 2023 23:56:20 +0000 (UTC) From: professor rat To: CypherPunks Subject: > Anonymity for all - mixmasters for the masses - globalized anarchism now! > Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: > text/plain; charset=UTF-8 These are cryptoanarchist benchmarks and stand in > total opposition to all govt KYC/ AML measures.?? There is only one question > - who is to be master? - that is all ( Humpty Dumpty ) Cypherpunks are all > about privacy for the poor and transparency for the powerful.? Amirite? The > possibility of anonymous speech, and publication is vital for an open society > and genuine freedom of speech. " Speech ? is also defined as computer code.in > US law https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernstein\_v.\_United\_States Apple > cited Bernstein v. US in its refusal to hack the San Bernardino shooter?s > iPhone, saying that they could not be compelled to ?speak? (write code) The > general sentiment of mankind is that a man who will not fight for himself, > when he has the means of doing so, is not worth being fought for by others, > and this sentiment is just. For a man who does not value freedom for himself > will never value it for others, or put himself to any inconvenience to gain > it for others. Such a man, the world says, may lie down until he has sense > enough to stand up. It is useless and cruel to put a man on his legs, if the > next moment his head is to be brought against a curbstone. Advocates for KYC/ > AML sound like they will die in the ditch for any govts right to suppress us > code-talkers.? Perhaps its time we indulged them.? The same rotten creepy > criminals want to attack our rights of association and disassociation via > mixmasters ( " Everyone a remailer " ) They would drag us all back to the > dark ages.? Naturally, they have all earned killing. " Government is best > which governs least"; and I should like to see it acted up to more rapidly > and systematically. Carried out, it finally amounts to this, which also I > believe??That government is best which governs not at all? Thoreau " . . . > governance should be decentralized? The real question is how decentralized > governance should be applied in every particular case." > https://www.benzinga.com/markets/cryptocurrency/23/11/35733564/blockchain-revolution-how-to-achieve-scalability-decentralization-and-regulatory-clarity?utm\_campaign=coingecko&utm\_source=coingecko&utm\_medium=coingecko&utm\_content=coingecko&utm\_term=coingecko > Reposts from corpse-media sources would smell as sweet - but not for much > longer ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2023 > 10:22:47 -0500 From: Gunnar Larson To: [email protected] Subject: Fwd: > Mayor Eric Adams NYCCoin Touting Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="utf-8" ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Gunnar Larson > Date: Fri, Mar 10, 2023, 4:00 PM Subject: Mayor Eric Adams NYCCoin Touting > To: Cc: , Harris, Adrienne A (DFS) < [email protected]> Please find > the attached memo with reference footnotes. -- March 10, 2023 BY ELECTRONIC > MAIL Ms. Camille Joseph Varlack Office of the Mayor of New York City City > Hall Park, 260 Broadway New York, NY 10007 United States > [email protected] Re: Mayor Eric Adams NYCCoin Touting Dear Ms. > Joseph Varlack: Today?s memo is to kindly submit xNY.io - Bank.org's inquiry > into Mayor Eric Adams' promotion of NYCCoin. 1. The federal securities laws > are clear that any celebrity or individual who promotes digital assets must > disclose the nature, source and amount of compensation they received in > exchange for the promotion. 2. As a matter of ethics, risk and compliance > associated with digital asset innovation, xNY.io asks if NYCCoin promotion by > the Mayor of New York City damaged the market for the xNY digital asset (by, > for example, devaluing it through parody or sealed via embossed criticism). > 3. xNY.io - Bank.org concerns made above have evidentiary support to > interlocking director and officer conflicts recognized by the Department of > Justice as potential threats that stifle individual and corporate freedom. > Ms. Joseph Varlack, as a matter relating to working at one of the world's > most ethical companies, famous for risk management and corporate governance, > and as an internationally recognized Blockchain Scholar, I must adhere to > federal securities laws. - As such, I classify Mayor Adams as an individual > who promoted the digital asset NYCCoin and must disclose the nature, scope, > and amount of compensation associated. A failure to disclose this information > may violate the anti-touting provisions of the federal securities laws. Mayor > Adams' making these endorsements may also be liable for potential violations > of the anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws, for > participating in an unregistered offer and sale of securities, and for acting > as unregistered brokers. xNY.io - Bank.org respectfully requests the Office > of the Mayor of New York City to respond to this request by Wednesday March, > 15 2023 by Noon EST. Respectfully yours with appreciation, Gunnar Larson - > xNY.io \- Bank.org MSc \- Digital Currency MBA \- Entrepreneurship and > Innovation (ip) [email protected] +1-917-580-8053 -------------- next part > -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available > Type: text/html Size: 14234 bytes Desc: not available URL: \-------------- > next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: xNY.io - > Bank.org \_ Mayor Eric Adams NYCoin Tweet Proceeds .pdf Type: application/pdf > Size: 90660 bytes Desc: not available URL: \------------------------------ > Subject: Digest Footer > \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ > cypherpunks mailing list [email protected] > https://lists.cpunks.org/mailman/listinfo/cypherpunks > ------------------------------ End of cypherpunks Digest, Vol 125, Issue 22 > \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*
publickey - EmailAddress([email protected]) - 0xBD1485A8.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
