https://www.wired.com/story/his-writing-radicalized-young-hackers-now-he-wants-to-redeem-them/

His Writing Radicalized Young Hackers. Now He Wants to Redeem Them

===================================================================

Cory Doctorow’sLittle Brotherseries has been a young-adult sci-fi bible for 
teen hacktivists. But with the latest and darkest book in the trilogy, it’s all 
grown up.

SET THE FIRSTand last books in Cory Doctorow’s epic, three-bookLittle 
Brothercypherpunk saga side by side, and they read a bit like a creative 
writing master class on telling two starkly opposite stories from the same 
prompt. The common premise: Islamist terrorists bomb the Bay Bridge. Thousands 
die. The Department of Homeland responds by turning San Francisco into a 
fascist, total-surveillance police state. The protagonist, a digitally gifted, 
troublemaking teen, must decide how to respond.

In the firstLittle Brotherinstallment, which Doctorow published in 2008, the 
answer seemed righteously inevitable: The hero uses his hacker skills to fight 
back. Specifically, he and his plucky hacker friends figure out how to 
jailbreak their Xboxes and channel the video game consoles’ encrypted comms 
over the Tor network to create Xnet, a cheap, anonymous, surveillance-proof 
system for organizing protest and foiling the panopticon cops by injecting 
false data into their totalitarian schemes.

In Doctorow’s third work in the series,publishing this week and titled Attack 
Surface, the protagonist takes an altogether different path. And while that 
path threads through the same alternate-world timeline of events, it’s tinted 
with all the shades of gray that the world has accumulated in the dozen long 
years since the series’ first, wide-eyed story.

This time the hero—or antihero, more like—instead chooses to go work for the 
DHS. After all, she’s angry, itching to use her prowess in digital 
exploitation, and someone needs to help hunt these terrorists who actually 
knows what she’s doing. To get the job, she breaks into her friends’ Xnet 
system—it was riddled with hackable bugs, of course—and uses information 
cascade modeling to identify all of the resistance’s leaders, then serves up 
the map to the authorities. Not long after, she swaps her DHS job for a 
contract position in Iraq, where she uses those same tricks to identify 
insurgent leaders, hack their devices, find them, and target them for killing.

The money is very good, and it keeps getting better. She’s transferred to 
Mexico City, switches contractors, and becomes accustomed to flying 
first-class, room service in Japanese-themed hotels, and aged scotch on the 
corporate account. Eventually she finds her employer is offering her 
exploitation skills to a kleptocratic Eastern European government that’s using 
them to suppress a “color revolution”-style movement. To assuage her guilt, she 
starts helping the dissidents, too, building surveillance systems by day and 
advising idealistic young rebels on how to defeat them by night—even while 
knowing that they’re almost certainly doomed, that the technological terrain 
has put them at an impossible disadvantage.

InLittle Brother,the series’ first book, Doctorow’s narrator was the idealistic 
and ultimately naive crypto-rebel Marcus Yallow. InAttack Surface, the latest, 
it’s the realist, cynical, ethically compromised spy, Masha Maximow. But 
Doctorow doesn’t want the reader to choose between the two. He wants you to see 
yourself in both Marcus and Masha, equally, to live out his morality tale from 
both perspectives. And he argues that second perspective may be far more 
relatable: His latest book is designed not for the fresh-faced Marcuses who are 
still ethically unblemished, but for the far larger population of Mashas who 
have already made moral compromises in their tech careers—who already work at a 
privacy-invasive social media giant, an adtech firm, a surveillance contractor, 
or an intelligence agency.

“I want to reach people who are maybe belated Robert Oppenheimers, who are 
thinking about whether or not it's a good idea to be running this Manhattan 
Project to manipulate people or spy on people or control people,” Doctorow told 
WIRED in an interview last week ahead ofAttack Surface’s release. “If you found 
yourself in tech because you were excited by how much self-determination and 
power and pleasure you got from mastering technology, and then found your 
entire professional life devoted to ensuring that no one else ever felt that, 
this is the time for your moral reckoning.”

Doctorow’s goal isn’t to shame those readers, nor to absolve them. His message 
for all of those ethically compromised Mashas, he says, is that it’s not too 
late. “Now is the time to figure out which side of the struggle you're on,” he 
says. “The side of computers controlling us, or the side of computers giving us 
control.”

For the last 12 years, Doctorow'sLittle Brotherseries has inspired and 
influenced digital subversives from Aaron Swartz to Laura Poitras to Edward 
Snowden.PHOTOGRAPH: JUCO

THE FIRST PERSONto tell me aboutLittle Brotherwas John Gilmore, cofounder of 
the Electronic Frontier Foundation and of theoriginal Cypherpunks, the 1990s 
techno-libertarian group that coined the term. As we sat in a coffee shop in 
San Francisco’s Mission District on a rainy day in 2011, Gilmore talked me 
through the whole cypherpunk canon: Tim May’sCyphernomicon, Eric Hughes’ 
“Cypherpunks’ Manifesto,” and the legendary Cypherpunks Mailing List, which 
Gilmore had once hosted on his own server and whose archives he copied onto a 
USB drive for me on the spot. And by the way, had I heard about a very 
interesting young-adult fiction book about teens using crypto tools to take on 
the DHS?

By then, in fact,Little Brotherwas already a best seller and was quickly 
becoming required reading for a certain class of young, digital dissidents. 
When Nathan Freitas, today the director of the smartphone-focused privacy 
nonprofit Guardian Project, downloaded the ebook in 2008, he found that it 
captured his experience unlike anything he’d ever read before. “It was the 
world I had lived in since 9/11,” says Freitas, who at the time had left a job 
as a developer for mobile device firm Palm to become a pro bono security 
consultant, working on behalf of every underdog from protesters at the 
Republican National Convention to Tibetan monks demonstrating against Chinese 
rule.

Little Brotherquickly became the book Freitas tried to convince every young 
technologist to read, to recruit them into a more political use of cryptography 
and hacking. Over the following years he watched it grow into a kind of bible 
for the digital protest movement, a piece of science fiction that felt far more 
immediate and urgent than sci-fi’s hacker classics. “It was a call to action 
for people who then would reference it in the way that people used to 
referenceSnow CrashorNeuromancer,” Freitas says. “It was a kind of touchstone 
for this idea that ‘now it's serious, now the internet is connected to our 
lives and war and oppression and surveillance.’”

Most Popular

-   GEAR

    Prime Day 2020: The 65 Absolute Best Deals (Updated)

    GEAR TEAM

-   GEAR

    Amazon Prime Day: 28 Best Deals if You Work From Home (Updated)

    JULIAN CHOKKATTU AND GEAR TEAM

-   GEAR

    Prime Day 2020 Is Over: Here Are the 32 Best Remaining Deals (Updated)

    GEAR TEAM

-
-   GEAR

    The iPhone 12 Ships Without a Charger. Will It Curb E-Waste?

    JULIAN CHOKKATTU


ADVERTISEMENT

In 2009, Freitas putLittle Brotheron the reading list for a class he taught at 
New York University's Interactive Telecommunications Program. One of the 
graduate students in that NYU class was Harlo Holmes, who today serves as 
director of digital security at the Freedom of the Press Foundation,teaching 
activists and journalists how to combat surveillance.

Holmes says that reading Doctorow’s book changed her life. “There was nothing 
more fundamental to my particular origin story than the semester I spent in 
that class and readingLittle Brother,” Holmes says. “It informed my thoughts 
around how privacy should work, the interplay between movement activists, 
technology, and the law, and what you should look out for when inviting 
technologies into your life to do that movement building.” Holmes’ final 
project for Freitas’ class was a smartphone camera tool she called “A Bigger 
Brother,” which has since evolved intoInformacam, designed to pull in phone 
sensor data and embed it in images to prove the authenticity of photos taken by 
protesters, such as images documenting police violence.

In February 2013, Doctorow published anotherLittle Brotherbook titledHomeland. 
This sequel told the story of how Doctorow’s hero, Marcus Yallow, is given a 
USB drive full of scandalous, classified secrets from spy agencies—torture, 
drone strikes, mass surveillance—and has to decide how to make it all public 
without inflicting collateral damage on innocent lives, including his own.

The book featured an afterword from Aaron Swartz, the young hacktivist who had 
been criminally prosecuted for downloading a collection of academic papers from 
the paywalled repository JSTOR in the hopes of making them freely available. 
Just two months beforeHomeland’s release, facing years in prison,Swartz had 
committed suicide. His posthumous words resonated inHomeland’s pages: “The 
system is changing,” Swartz wrote. “Thanks to the Internet, everyday people can 
learn about and organize around an issue even if the system is determined to 
ignore it. Now, maybe we won’t win every time—this is real life, after all—but 
we finally have a chance.”

A month later, documentary filmmaker and journalist Laura Poitras was 
readingHomelandwhile exchanging PGP keys and encrypted emails about bombshell 
NSA documents with a source she knew only as “Citizenfour.” Poitraswrote in her 
journalthat the book “feels likes a mirror of the exact fucking reality I’m 
living in. National security leaks, detention, threat of death, key passing.”

A few months later, Poitras traveled to Hong Kong withGuardianjournalists Glenn 
Greenwald and Ewan MacAskill to meet Citizenfour, whose real name was Edward 
Snowden. She gave Snowden a copy ofHomeland. After the whistleblower and 
journalists had collaborated to publish the biggest leak of NSA secrets in 
history, Snowden took the book with him on his journey into exile in Russia. In 
her subsequent documentary about Snowden,Citizenfour, Doctorow’s book appears 
on the bedside table of his hotel room, next to a tangle of cables and piled 
laptops.

“That moment inCitizenfourwhere Snowden grabs a copy ofHomelandand sticks it in 
his go bag, that’s kind of the apotheosis of it right there,” Doctorow says. 
“That was the moment when I thought, in some tiny way, I have been part of the 
moral instruction of some part of the current generation of technologists. The 
idea that now, whenever someone sits down to make a choice—do I take power away 
from users or do I give it to them?—Little Brothermight be weighing on their 
conscience, that is an awesome responsibility and a source of incredible pride.”

Snowden himself says he's been reading Doctorow since his early twenties, long 
before Poitras handed him that copy of the secondLittle Brotherbook. "He is to 
me a radical idealist, because no matter how bad things get, his mind goes to 
the stories of cooperation and creation-sharing," Snowden wrote in a text 
message to WIRED. "When the traditional structures of oppression are up to no 
good, as was the case inLittle Brother, Cory doesn't reflexively indoctrinate 
young readers with platitudes on the inevitability of corruption. He helps them 
reimagine the limits of their own power."

“Cory doesn't reflexively indoctrinate young readers with platitudes on the 
inevitability of corruption,” Edwards Snowden says. "He helps them reimagine 
the limits of their own power."PHOTOGRAPH: JUCO

DESPITE THE DARK-AS-TOMORROW’S-HEADLINESthemes at their core,Little 
BrotherandHomelandwere young-adult novels, a two-part teen radical’s 
primer.Attack Surface, by contrast, is for actual adults, Doctorow says. Not 
because it has more adult language, violence, or sex—Doctorow cut the only sex 
scene in the book from the final draft—but because it deals with the very adult 
problem of having lived an ethically imperfect life.

“The thing adults do is confront their moral legacy. They look back on what 
they've done and they think about their regrets,” Doctorow says. “The ongoing 
process of being an adult is having been corralled into compromises and then 
making sense of those compromises for yourself.”

Doctorow says the book is meant to stand alone for new readers—even non-techy, 
civilian observers on the sidelines of the crypto wars—but that it’s also meant 
to speak to the core, cypherpunk audience of the first twoLittle Brotherbooks. 
And that includes the ones who didn’t turn out to be the heroes of their own 
story. “A bunch of people who grew up readingLittle Brother, imagining that 
they would become revolutionaries, woke up one day and realized that they're 
not revolutionaries, that in fact they're helping to make things worse, that 
they're part of a system that harms people,” says Eva Galperin, alongtime 
digital activist and head of the Electronic Frontier Foundation’s Threat Lab. 
Galperin serves in part as the inspiration for Masha’s character—both hackers, 
fictional and nonfictional, were born in the Soviet Union but grew up in San 
Francisco with immigrant parents.

But Galperin sees Masha also in her idealistic friends who went to work for 
Facebook or Palantir or government agencies, vowing to change them from the 
inside but finding themselves changed instead. “This is a book for the people 
who realize that they've grown up and made a lot of compromises,” Galperin 
says, “and about how you turn back from that.”

Attack Surface at some points reads almost like an admission of regret from 
Doctorow himself. When Masha describes how easily she exploited and rolled up 
Marcus Yallow’s Xnet for the DHS or the limits of encryption in an era when spy 
agencies and their contractors have hoards of zero-day vulnerabilities they can 
use to hack their targets, the book seems to be walking back a degree of 
technological solutionism that has long since gone out of style. At times it 
seems to even flirt with defeatism, conceding that all the techniques that 
worked to stop mass surveillance in Little Brother become useless the instant a 
sophisticated adversary has identified you as a subject for targeted 
surveillance.

At one point, Doctorow writes in Masha’s voice about the hero of his earlier 
works in a passage that might also be read as Doctorow berating his past self:

“What I truly hated about Marcus Yallow, above all else, was this: He gave 
people hope when no hope was called for. He told them they could master their 
computers and their networks, communicate in private and in secret, form 
networks of mutual aid and use them to bring down the powerful and unjust. But 
I’ve been on the other side of the data center, I’ve seen how hard it is to 
cover your tracks, to be perfect in your opsec, to know who and what to trust, 
to write code that is flawless.”

But Doctorow says that the intention ofAttack Surfacewasn’t to swing in the 
other direction on the spectrum between “nerd triumphalism” and “nerd despair,” 
as he puts it. Instead, it’s to find a more nuanced middle ground, one that 
acknowledges that technology can win some battles, but that others must be won 
with human willpower and political struggle, sometimes with the aim of 
controlling technology’s most dangerous applications.

The title ofAttack Surfacecomes from thecybersecurity term for a target 
system’s exposure to exploitation: The more attack surfaces—external 
connections and inputs—the more vulnerable the system is to hacking. But 
Doctorow says he chose the title because he defines “attack surface” as the 
volatile edge where two systems meet. Those systems might be a hackable device 
and the internet, or technology and the law, or even technology and human 
beings, with each having the power to potentially exploit the other.

Those edges add up to a far more complex and unpredictable picture than the one 
Doctorow sketched inLittle Brother. The world ofAttack Surfaceis one where 
technology isn’t necessarily a force for good or evil, but where it has to be 
bent to the right cause by human ethics. “Technology is a tool that gives us 
space to make political change. Politics are a tool we use to open the space 
for making better technology,” one wise character summarizes near the end 
ofAttack Surface, lecturing both Marcus and Masha. “It’s like parallel parking: 
You go as far as you can in one direction, then back up and go as far as you 
can in the other.”

Across its three-book arc, theLittle Brothernow achieves something similar: 
After driving his car to the extremes of digital idealism, Doctorow has backed 
it up to the other extreme of digital pessimism. And in doing so, he’s carved 
out a space for himself to fit a far messier truth between the two.


Reply via email to