On 20-08-14 05:34:35, grarpamp wrote: > > I believe the reason this is considered spam is because > > ...antispam. > > No, the actual reasons were detailed in the score block.
I know.
> Humorous such a system claiming to "protect" users
> from "spam" to be modifying the subject, adding blocks
> of data *spam* to it, and then itself be *spamming* the
> subscribers with the result.
As I said, I believe you confused the system.
> [Snip]
>
> > you copied rendered HTML elements
>
> Nope.
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I said /rendered/ HTML elements. Look at your own damn email
> > email is incredibly large paragraphs
>
> Nmp.
You should consider who is going to read your emails if all you're
doing is copy/pasting entire articles unabridged.
--
|-----/ | Se7en
/ The One and Only! | [email protected]
/ | 0x0F83F93882CF6116
/ | https://se7en-site.neocities.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
