On Tue, Aug 11, 2020, 7:16 AM Karl <[email protected]> wrote: > James, > > I'm checking with you that we can communicate clear, concise information > that is to both our benefits, through the harsh sea of the internet. > > I named to you below 3 open source networks that use varying degrees of > cryptography and network organization to resist censorship. > > I sent these in response to you instructing me to look on uncensored > social media. > > Later, when you replied, the quote I received from you didn't include the > list of censorship resistant networks I sent. Is there any chance you can > confirm you received them, so we can verify the integrity of the list? > > If uncensored networks are not discussed to prevent their disruption, > which is likely an incredibly good idea, please let me know if that norm > has been established, but the three networks I referenced are all public. > > Did anybody else receive my small open source network list below? I have > recently received only a reference to bitmessage from this list, but I do > not read all the messages all the time. > > If a norm has been established to not reference uncensored networks so as > to prevent their disruption, which is likely an incredibly good idea, > please let me know: but the 3 networks I referenced are all public. >
Sorry for the editing error of sending this paragraph twice. Cut-and-paste isn't working on my phone (and many things are not working on my laptop) and I failed to delete the other paragraph when editing. > James, I still have not received from you any reference to what networks > you mean when you say "uncensored social media" to know where to look. > > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2020, 5:38 AM Karl <[email protected]> wrote: > >> James, we have a lot of different beliefs here. >> >> I don't know where to go on uncensored channels to find the videos you >> describe. I consider uncensored social media to be scuttlebutt, mastodon, >> possibly steem ... What do you consider uncensored social media? >> >> I know these particular friends well enough to predict their behavior >> accurately and am pretty certain they are not lying. So I get emotionally >> charged when I read what you write, and it's hard to read much of it. >> >> My activist friend just wanted to cry and be heard about seeing his >> friends murdered around him. It was all he seemed to want. >> >> You mention a black jogger, but not the george floyd video everybody >> struggled to get recognised this year ... what do you know about the george >> floyd video? >> >> K >> >> - >> >> There is proof inside many peoples' electronics. Proof that a marketing >> group would contract development of a frightening virus. A virus that >> responds to peoples' keystrokes and browsing habits, and changes what >> people see on their devices. A virus that alters political behavior en >> masse, for profit. >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 3, 2020, 9:35 PM <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 2020-08-03 21:37, Karl wrote: >>> > James it sounds like we've been exposed to significantly different >>> media, >>> > giving us different beliefs. >>> >>> Just search uncensored social media. You will find huge numbers of >>> videos of black gangs attacking whites. >>> >>> Search the official organs of the state, such as the New York Times or >>> CNN. >>> >>> What do you find? >>> >>> What do you find on the official organs of our officially unofficial >>> state religion? >>> >>> You find a black "jogger" who was accosted by three white men after >>> committing a minor burglary, and grabbed the gun of one them by the >>> wrong end. >>> >>> > My knowledge of killing of blacks comes partly from hearing from >>> individual >>> > people exposed to it. >>> >>> They are lying to you because it makes them holy. It is like Christians >>> claiming to have witnessed miracles. >>> >>> If any of miracles that they had witnessed actually happened, they would >>> be in the front page of the New York Times every day for the next twenty >>> years. >>> >>> Everyone remembers Emmett Till, who was not in fact lynched, but >>> murdered, like no end of men of all races who made a pass at someone >>> else's wife. The problem was not that she was white and he was black, >>> but that she had a jealous husband. >>> >>> If in the entire history of the all of the United States, one black had >>> been lynched who was not plausibly accused of some serious crime, that >>> black man would be the poster boy for lynchings, not Emmett Till. >>> >>> If these things are happening, how come we cannot walk down the street >>> without being reminded of it by big character posters every ten feet? >>> >>> > My closest friend's black roommate had to leave due to harassment from >>> > whites expressing dislike of blacks who actually broke her door down >>> to get >>> > to her. >>> >>> Remember Jussie Smollet. If she was telling you the truth, why is every >>> single such story that media hears turn out to be a lie? >>> >>> Remember the Covington Boys. >>> >>> The media are so hungry for such incidents, that they invent them. They >>> search high and low for such incidents, and have not found one such >>> incident in the past several decades. Remember all the drama about a >>> garage door opener that someone thought looked vaguely like a noose. >>> >>> Are you sure they did not express dislike of her because of theft and >>> assault? Are you sure she did not just stop turning up to college >>> because she got bored, and told a better sounding story? >>> >>> If white people actually broke down the door of a black college student >>> while expressing dislike of blacks, you would not be hearing it from her >>> and I not be hearing it from you. I would be hearing it on television >>> for days or weeks or months. >>> >>> There has not been one arbitrary lynching for frivolous cause anywhere >>> in the United States ever, nor one such incident as you describe >>> anywhere in the United States in the past few decades. >>> >>> The media has shouted no end of such stories from the rooftops, and not >>> one single one has ever held up. >>> >>> >>>
