I think the most common tech term is "depreciation". Tor should be o marked on their boot page but that assumes there is a practical replacement.
On Sat, Dec 14, 2019, 2:38 AM grarpamp <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> snowden also said that > >>> the NSA can't break tor. > >> Such blanket context is unlikely. > > was > > Also unfortunate that, today, one of the few places still > propagating such blankets, in reverse via false advertising, > downplaying, failing to mention, etc... is the Tor project itself, > not least where is on its very own front page. > > Attacks on today's overlays may not be exactly cheap > fast easy or wholesale, but they do exist and are in use. > > There is no project today that should not at least > be putting a link to such warnings and docs... > on the front page, download page, in the app, etc. > > And no reason that when designs and efforts thought to make > existing attacks a significant factor harder... upon their startup > 10, 15, 20 years ago at that time... whose fundamental > underlying technology is now matured to point of diminishing > returns on investment against continuously advancing attacks... > should not be marked and understood as such by the entire > overlay community, so that new fundamental treatise > are naturally encouraged. >
