Well, people (?) have been speaking quite recently about apparent problems
with the Cypherpunks list email-acceptance reliability. Do we (or you?) have
any reason to believe such reports are deliberately phony? I think the large
majority of comments I've made recently to CP (days, weeks) have proceeded
promptly. So when I see an aberration, I identify it as such.
After about 74 minutes of non-appearance of that message, at least failing to
return back to me in a virtually comment free list (indicating that the server
can't possibly be 'busy'), I think any logical person familiar with the working
of email lists (and specifically CP) would suspect that the sent message had
simply been "lost", and the logical response would have been to re-post it, as
I did.
Yet, you are strongly implying that my interpretation of events was somehow
wrong or even illogical.
On Sunday, November 3, 2019, 12:06:56 PM PST, Razer <[email protected]>
wrote:
>Just because you haven't received your copy yet (or at all) doesn't mean we
>haven't.
Just because you MAY have received your copy (you might be lying; presumably,
we'll hear from others soon enough to determine if my first attempt to send the
message actually got through to anyone else) doesn't mean you have a correct
position.) You MIGHT have only seen the second message, which included the
original header, and decided to muddy the water and 'score points' by implying
that I interpreted events incorrectly.)
And, I note, nobody else responded (yet) to my recent first attempt to send
that message. Had I received even one such answer, that would have suggested
that the CP server had successfully posted my message. The absence of any
response, to me, even 74 minutes later, at least doesn't contradict the idea
that the CP server had somehow coughed and failed, at least on one email.
>Rr
>Sent from my Androgyne dee-vice
>Ps. Get psychiatric help
Your illogical reactions, could also reflect YOUR need for such psychiatric
help. I, at least, can actually justify my actions and reasoning. Put
simply, I'm believable, and you are not.
