On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 3:26 PM, juan <[email protected]> wrote: > https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/canary_in_a_coal_mine
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQEIYjS1ePY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bA9FiL7mz_0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lrEM3LHvjI0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LxPYOZCY3pQ > 'illegal' content end up in jail. Opsec is hard. > 'Honeypot' Vulnerability whitepapers are more objective. Suspicion is harder to prove. Some rightly consider both as equally broken. That's fine. Pick or build another darknet. > where's are the link to the 'uncensored' stuff on the 'dark web' > 'powered' by tor's 'hidden' services? Seek and ye shall find whatever be yer fancy. > this issue on tor's mailing list? Posters have spoken there on such topics from time to time. Feel free to do similarly. > party line? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Party_line_(telephony) Party lines provided no privacy in communication. They were frequently used as a source of entertainment and gossip. Eavesdropping on calls remained an ongoing concern. Police had used a party-line telephone in a rented house on the same line as the suspects to unlawfully intercept their communications. The calling party would misidentify themselves in an attempt to send the bill to another party.
