On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 05:35:11PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >I have applied a patch to accept(), btw. This should now work in the >given scenario. It occured to me that the returned value is incorrect >for AF_UNIX/AF_LOCAL sockets, but that was always the case and it's not >a regression. Usually the peer address of an AF_UNIX socket is not of >interest anyway. I added that to my TODO list and probably fix that in >a later release.
A snapshot is coming soon. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
