On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Larry Adams wrote: > My concern is that the "*_t" typedefs are supposed to be hardware architecture > agnostic, and there must have been some reason, other than "geeze everything > else is that way, so why not do those two" to have done this for Solaris.
An understandable concern, though I'm having trouble imagining any scenario where a sensible definition of "ushort_t" and "uchar_t" would be anything other than "unsigned short" and "unsigned char". -- Mark J. Reed <markjr...@gmail.com> -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
