Chuck,
While reviewing the libtool-patches list I came across a discussion[1]
about compiler option support that gave me an idea.
The attached patch (against the latest 2.2.7a snapshot, not taking the
other patch into account) should allow libtool to accept the
-{shared,static}-libgcc flags and just pass them on to gcc.
Thoughts?
Yaakov
[1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2009-06/msg00023.html
2009-08-09 Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkow...@users.sourceforge.net>
* libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh (func_mode_link): Pass the
-shared-libgcc/-static-libgcc flags along to GCC.
--- origsrc/libtool-2.2.7a/libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh 2009-08-08
23:32:27.135450100 -0500
+++ src/libtool-2.2.7a/libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh 2009-08-08
23:45:51.012483200 -0500
@@ -4378,8 +4378,10 @@ func_mode_link ()
# -p, -pg, --coverage, -fprofile-* pass through profiling flag for GCC
# @file GCC response files
# -tp=* Portland pgcc target processor selection
+ # -{shared,static}-libgcc: force GCC to link against specified libgcc
-64|-mips[0-9]|-r[0-9][0-9]*|-xarch=*|-xtarget=*|+DA*|+DD*|-q*|-m*| \
- -t[45]*|-txscale*|-p|-pg|--coverage|-fprofile-*|-F*|@*|-tp=*)
+ -t[45]*|-txscale*|-p|-pg|--coverage|-fprofile-*|-F*|@*|-tp=*| \
+ -shared-libgcc|-static-libgcc)
func_quote_for_eval "$arg"
arg="$func_quote_for_eval_result"
func_append compile_command " $arg"
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
