On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 09:05:04AM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote: >On Monday 03 August 2009 08:33:44 Tomas Ulicky wrote: >>Hi, it is possible to start releasing pure x64 version of stunnel? >>OpenSSL exist in x64 version and there is gcc that can create x64 >>binaries. It will be good to have one, because in Windows 2008 R2 >>server there will be uninstallable support for x86 to harden security >>and no x86 binary will run on it. Thanks > >I assume that this is a Cygwin question. Please direct Cygwin >questions to the cygwin mailing list, so that other people can >participate in and benefit from the conversation. > >AFAIK, Cygwin is as of now a purely 32-bit environment. Until there's >a 64- bit DLL to link against, I don't think a 64-bit stunnel would be >possible or useful.
That's right Cygwin is purely 32-bit. I think that things will stay that way until someone pays Red Hat (or me) to change this. Making cygwin work in a real 64-bit environment will be quite a bit of work. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
