Eric Blake <ebb9 <at> byu.net> writes: > Of course, given the code, that meant I wasn't using libsigsegv like I thought > I was. So, with my typo corrected, I'm (unfortunately) still seeing libsigsegv > interference: > > $ ./foo > fclose -1, errno 9 > Aborted (core dumped)
Even more depressing - this looks like a regression. The same STC, compiled with libsigsegv under cygwin 1.5, works in that environment. And I'm not sure what to do in gdb to try and get more useful information: Breakpoint 1, die () at foo.c:19 19 i = fclose (stdout); (gdb) n 20 fprintf (stderr, "fclose %d, errno %d\n", i, errno); (gdb) 21 errno = 0; (gdb) 22 i = fflush (stdout); (gdb) Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. 0x7c90e514 in ntdll!LdrAccessResource () from /cygdrive/c/WINDOWS/system32/ntdll.dll -- Eric Blake -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
