On Jul 16 17:15, Eric Blake wrote: > Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin <at> cygwin.com> writes: > > Eric Blake wrote: > > > Maybe for MVFS it would be better to > > > return EBUSY instead of letting unlink succeed when the handle is > > > still open by another process: > > > > That would be something I could add, but this isn't overly important > > right now, IMHO. Just bug me with this again at one point. I assume > > this can be a generic solution as well for any remote filesystem. > > Agreed that this would be nice, but I'm okay with post 1.7.1.
I applied a patch which now always returns EBUSY if a sharing violation occurs on a remote filesystem. Please give it a thorough check. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
