On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 09:09:52PM +0300, Eray Ozkural wrote: >It cost me a lot of time but I verified that gcc-4 is malfunctioning >on both versions. > >It's impossible to build boost-1.38 or build-1.39, even if you build >only static libs. > >I had to use the gcc 4 that I had built myself previously on cygwin-1.5 > >And I think boost is pretty essential. > >Did you patch gcc-4 or something? Whatever it is, I would like an >unpatched version if possible, as a C++ user. Could you make an >alternative package please? It must be that auto-import thingie that's >FUBAR'd. > >At any rate, C++/boost users attention: don't use cygwin's own gcc-4 >package, it's badly broken.
The person who maintains gcc/g++ is ready, willing, and able to fix problems. This content free report does not give him anything to work with, however. You have to do a much better job of reporting the problem if you truly want a solution and don't just want to complain. -- Christopher Faylor Cygwin Co-Project Leader -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
