Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin <at> cygwin.com> writes: > Bash isn't the only affected binary so it's still worth the FAQ entry. > But, never mind, I just created one.
The FAQ should mention the 'rebase' package, not the 'rebaseall' package. And not to sound anxious, but are we going to have a new binutils and gcc release prior to cygwin 1.7 going golden? I've noticed that Dave has made lots of patches on the binutils list lately. -- Eric Blake -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
