On May 14 17:51, Jeff Johnston wrote: > Corinna, I have no problem with checking the new patch in and extending > this later, assuming you have thoroughly tested this implementation.
I tested it with _MB_CAPABLE defined and with _MB_CAPABLE undefined. Both variations worked as expected, the latter using the old newlib implementation using iswprint/iswcntrl. Patch applied. I have adding the CJK variation on my todo list for when I'm back from vacation. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Project Co-Leader Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
