On May 5 17:28, Chris LeBlanc wrote: > Hi Dave, > > Thanks for the description of the problem, and the workaround. Our > code is pretty complicated at points, so it might be challenging to be > sure of the include order, but I'll try. > > The other suggestion I saw from Christopher Faylor was to try Cygwin > commercial support. This was actually the first major problem I've > had with Cygwin, so I haven't had to use it before and didn't even > think of it. I'll try contacting them tomorrow, and possibly get a > fix for the strange looking defines in Xwindows.h, so the order of > includes shouldn't matter. Personally, I'd be happy with sleep() > being defined in unistd.h, and Sleep() defined in Windows.h, and > keeping the two separate.
AFAICS this is a generic problem with the X11/Xwindows.h file which should be fixed upstream. The definition of sleep as Sleep might be fine for a native X server, but not for the Cygwin X server and should be guarded with a #ifndef __CYGWIN__. Yaakov? Can you take a look into this? Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
